Managers perform for Texas Teachers

A row of boots sits for sale in a Dallas, TX western wear store. Shot with Canon EOS 5D.

The selection of investment managers contributed almost three-quarters of the 168 basis points of excess returns the $146 billion Teacher Retirement System of Texas generated in the 12 months ended September 30, 2017.

Individual manager outperformance added 122 basis points of outperformance as Texas Teachers posted a 12.9 per cent return for the year, exceeding its benchmark of 11.2 per cent.

In a presentation to the fund’s board this month, Aon Hewitt Investment Consulting partner Steve Voss said this was Texas Teachers’ second-strongest rolling one-year return ever, “second only to roughly a 2010 timeframe, when markets were just starting to improve following the crash [and] you had a lot of credit investments that were” excelling.

Individual managers of real-asset portfolios did “exceptionally well”, Voss said, along with private equity managers, directional hedge funds and stable-value hedge funds – “all added value quite notably above their benchmark”.

About 20 per cent of Texas Teachers is invested in real assets, where the managers the fund selected returned 10.9 per cent for the year to September 30, compared with the benchmark of 6.1 per cent.

The bulk of those real assets are in real estate and energy, natural resources and infrastructure.

Sponsored Content

“Those areas have done exceptionally well,” Voss said, adding that the fund’s investment management division (IMD) has done “a great job of adding value and finding good managers in that space”.

Voss said asset allocation had also helped the fund exceed its benchmark; for example, the decision to underweight US Treasury bonds contributed 49 basis points of outperformance.

There was lost value as well. Over the year, the fund was overweight absolute return strategies, which cost about 14 basis points of value. Overall, however, asset allocation contributed 41 basis points of the total value added for the year.

“The average underweight the last year for US Treasuries has been -2.3 per cent,” Voss said. “The decision IMD has made to underweight Treasuries has had quite an effect; it’s had a half-per cent impact for this past year. That one decision alone has been remarkably additive.”

Voss warned against letting the current low-volatility environment cause complacency to creep in and lull investors into accepting investment risk that might be “greater than one should be taking on”.

“Volatility has been at an all-time low,” Voss said, and for the last three years has been about 5 per cent for the fund’s benchmark portfolio.

“I don’t recall a time…when we’ve seen volatility as low as this,” he said. Looking forward, volatility is expected to be significantly higher, in the 10 per cent to 14 per cent range.

“It’s been a very quiet, low-vol period,” Voss said.

The value of Texas Teachers’ assets stood at $146.2 billion at September 30, 2017, up from $133.2 billion a year earlier. Investment earnings added $16.1 billion to the fund’s value over the period, taking total investment earnings for the fund over the last five years to $54.2 billion, with net withdrawals for the year of just over $3 billion.

Voss said TRS has outperformed its investment benchmark in 14 of the last 20 quarters.

Leave a Comment

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest, the largest workplace pension in the UK, says that private credit managers who prioritise institutional clients will be more favourably viewed. The £61 billion ($82 billion) fund has awarded a £450 million ($605 million) US direct lending mandate to Crescent Capital this month, citing the manager's institutional-client-first approach as a key attraction.

Sort content by

Costs cast increasing doubt over hedge fund relevance

The inability to scale hedge fund exposures and risks, has led many large investors, like CalPERS this week and ATP last year, to exit their hedge fund programs. Complexity continues to be a drain on the relevancy of hedge funds, but importantly cost is driving the agendas of these investors. As AQR’s Cliff Asness admits,

Why Sunsuper likes hedge funds

One of Australia’s largest superannuation funds, the $27 billion Sunsuper, is adamant that it gets value out of its large hedge fund program. This is against the grain in Australia, where many large funds (with the exception of the Future Fund) choosing not to invest in hedge funds. So why does Sunsuper favour hedge funds?

Japan’s GPIF allocates to smart beta

The $1.3 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan will use factor investing, or smart beta, as a third way of implementing equity mandates, alongside active and passive, following a six-month research project conducted by MSCI that investigated how to best implement the growing interest in factor exposures.   The research project conducted by MSCI

Capital provider: Australia’s Sunsuper

The $26 billion Australian super fund, Sunsuper, is investing in an increasing amount of exclusive unlisted asset deals. Chief investment officer David Hartley says the difficulties of banks in Europe in particular have led the fund down the path of increasing the amount of debt investments in its unlisted exposure. Much of this has been

What’s the impact of the stock:bond correlation?

The correlation between stocks and bonds in a rising interest rate environment can turn positive. So given the likelihood of a rate rise, what should asset allocation look like if investors are forward looking?   One of the growing trends in asset and risk allocations is to adopt a forward-looking view driven by macroeconomics, rather

Recasting private equity after the financial crisis

This article published by the European Corporate Governance and written by Tilburg University academics examines the post-financial crisis trends in the private equity industry, showing investors are demanding the inclusion of more investor-favorable compensation terms in limited partnership agreements. The findings suggest these new terms not only provide the investors with more favorable management fee and profit

Previous