Distressed Kentucky fund regroups

Among the 10 different pension and insurance schemes within the $16 billion Kentucky Retirement Systems portfolio lies one of America’s most distressed pension plans.

At only 17 per cent funded, the Kentucky Employees Retirement System (KERS) Non-Hazardous Plan is the biggest headache for chief investment officer David Peden. Speaking from the fund’s headquarters in Louisville, Kentucky – the US state best known for its horse racing and fried chicken – Kentucky-native Peden is under more pressure than the average pension fund CIO.

“Our investment decisions are under the microscope because of the funded status of the KERS plan,” he explains. “It’s a challenging place to be because even good investment returns will really have little impact on the health of the KERS system.”

And the investment returns Peden is dealing with are poor.

Rock-bottom bond yields and lacklustre equity gains have taken their toll on the portfolio, which reported a loss of 0.52 per cent in 2015. The worst performers were non-US and emerging market public equity (the allocation to emerging markets was axed through 2016) and hedge funds, in a result that falls short of the portfolio’s actuarially required rate of return of 7.5 per cent. Two of the 10 plans require a lower rate of return of 6.75 per cent.

Yet together with a new five-strong investment team, Peden is determined to turn Kentucky Retirement Systems’ fortunes around. He’s midway through altering the portfolio along fresh guidelines to cut costs and complexity and reduce risk.

Sponsored Content

“This is a complicated problem and we are putting as much intellectual firepower on this topic as we can,” he says, although he does acknowledge the challenge of recruiting dynamic teams in Kentucky. “We are not fully staffed; it’s a difficult place to recruit because Kentucky has only a small investment community.”

A first step has involved cutting the allocation to hedge funds by $800 million. Kentucky first invested in hedge funds five years ago and Peden stresses that this year’s lacklustre results are less of an issue in ditching the allocation than the desire to cut costs.

“Half of the hedge fund allocation will definitely be sold; the other half is under review. It is hard for hedge funds to sit within the context of a less complex and less expensive philosophy. It doesn’t mean they are wrong. In a [time of low inter-bank lending rates], while many may still be doing their job, it is difficult to justify the fee.”

Peden and his team will jettison the allocations that are duplicated in the main portfolio and don’t provide “enough bang for their buck”, such as equity beta, and credit beta in fixed income.

Global macro and trend followers, fixed income arbitrage and convertible arbitrage will remain for now. Peden is also exploring using managed accounts, rather than limited partnership structures, to improve transparency.

“I can’t say where we will invest the money from the hedge fund allocation yet; I don’t know the answer. I will in the next month or so.”

KERS Non-Hazardous has just over half its portfolio in equity, comprising a passive core with active management. The fund has increased its allocation to equity in recent months to try to achieve the 7.5 per cent long-term return goal; 2015’s best-performing allocations were US equity, private equity and real estate. Nevertheless, gradually reducing the equity allocation in line with a more risk-averse strategy is another of Peden’s priorities going forward.

“Over the last three years, the non-US equity allocation, and the dollar impact of that, have been a big drag on the portfolio. It is time to have the conversation about what is the proper allocation between US and non-US equity.”

The current allocation of the pension assets is 25.6 per cent to US equities, 25.2 per cent to broad market international equities, 10 per cent to private equity, 10 per cent to absolute return strategies, 8 per cent to real return strategies, 7.2 per cent to credit fixed income, 6.8 per cent to global fixed income, 5 per cent to real estate, and 2.2 per cent to cash or short-term securities.

The fund has relationships with 105 managers and about half of those are in private equity.

“We are looking to have fewer, more meaningful manager relationships,” Peden says.

As of June 2016, KERS Non-Hazardous had $3 billion of commitments across 42 private equity managers (66 partnerships) gaining exposure across the spectrum of strategies, including buyout, venture and growth, and credit-oriented strategies.

Peden is hopeful that the first signs of a rotation are under way as a consequence of the US election result. The selloff in bonds and rally in US equities led by sectors closely tied to economic growth, like banks, plus surging treasury yields, could be the beginning of a new era.

“[For] three years prior to the US election, it has been a very difficult period to have a diversified portfolio,” he says. “Value is doing better [since] the US election. To me, it seems that the psychology of the market has tipped, post-election; it is saying we are coming out of recession. The traditional stock-picking market is coming back.”

If he’s right, it could be just the change Kentucky needs.

Leave a Comment

Texas ERS reallocates to managers to help navigate concentrated equity market

Texas ERS reallocates to managers to help navigate concentrated equity market

Texas ERS' CIO David Veal says the fund is re-allocating around a quarter of its public equity portfolio to external managers, away from the internal team. ERS plans to upsize with existing fundamental mandates but also allocate to new incremental relationships with diversifying strategies.

Sort content by

Oregon PE revamp shakes off GFC legacy

Oregon Investment Council has committed to investing $3 billion a year in private equity, with the smooth pacing strategy part a response to the fund’s overweight position to poor performing vintages as a result of its allocations before and after the GFC. The investor is also focusing on manager relationships with a focus on accessing new relationships and upsizing the best existing ones; and a new strategy that sees no provider in charge of more than 5 per cent of the portfolio.

India’s NIIF gathers steam

India’s new sovereign development fund has raised a further £1.3 billion, on top of the government's $3 billion, to finance domestic infrastructure and growth. Key to its success is the unique investor-owned structure, similar to Australia's IFM Investors, and generous co-investment terms.

The future is quant

The pace of technological change and advances in machine learning and quantitative methods will result in a “shake out” in investment management according to Campbell Harvey, Professor of Finance at Duke University.

Future Fund sticks with hedge funds

Australia’s A$168 billion Future Fund is looking to add more money to its A$22.6 billion hedge fund program where it can find managers with spare capacity, to help protect the portfolio against a sell-off in the equity market.

APG China strategy: In-house with E Fund

APG's capacity to carry out its own research has meant it is ahead of the curve in allocation millions to its first local currency China fixed income strategy. APG is also setting itself up to be a catalyst for change and aims to set new standards on ESG in China.

CalPERS board’s divestment dilemmas

The merits of tracking divested dollars, and the value of data illustrating what the pension fund has missed out on was the topic of much debate at the December CalPERS board meeting. In 2021 the fund will review six divestment programs across tobacco, firearms, coal, Iran, Sudan and emerging market equity principles.

Previous