Investors should backoff policy: Kay

Pension funds have “no business” engaging with policy makers but instead should influence change through stewardship, which is also the main function of asset managers, according to John Kay, Supernumerary Fellow in Economics at St Johns College, Oxford University.

“As a pension fund I’m not sure you have any business engaging with policy makers. You can have your own personal views but you can’t have a view as a trustee of a pension fund,” he said at the 8th Sustainable Finance Forum. “Companies should also stop engaging with policymakers there is no legitimacy to this kind of lobbying. I want less funded political lobbying of all kinds.”

Kay said a dialogue needed to open up around what the legitimate activity of a business is, including the role of lobbying.

“What we need to do is amend the way these people think about their business, and change the rhetoric in how people talk about business,” he said.

Kay said that the rhetoric of “shareholder value” was being used as an excuse for businesses being run in the interests of a small number of people, mostly the senior employees.

“The great paradox in the rise of shareholder value, the rhetoric around business, is the description about what most businesses do is not correct – it’s repulsive and false,” he said. “We need to address that to solve the underlying problem of how we make business legitimate and respectable again.”

Sponsored Content

Kay said that the business of business, is business, and business is not about “doing good”.

“The corporation is not the vehicle for determining what we think a public benefit is. If the public good is to be determined by business people, you probably won’t like the concept of what that public good is. There’s not too little public engagement by companies, there is too much.”

Kay said the way to change the rhetoric is with different rhetoric.

“We’re talking about cultural changes. When people say you can’t do that, I say we have had a negative corporate cultural change since the 1980s, which indicates culture is malleable and if it has changed in one direction it can change in the other.”

Kay said it was imperative that asset owners collaborated in order to have impact.

“If you are a pension fund with limited resources you are a small shareholder in a particular company, even if you are Norges Bank or Blackrock you are a small shareholder. Getting together with others is key to this,” he said.

The Investor Forum was launched in the UK in response to the Kay Review of UK equity markets and long-term decision making in 2012, with the intention of promoting shared commitment to long-term strategies and sustainable wealth creation among asset owners, asset managers and companies.

“When I did the review, one outcome was to facilitate large shareholders working collectively to engage with companies. The Investor Forum is making it easier and giving an umbrella for institutional investors to work together. I hope we are moving in the right direction.”

Kay told delegates that stewardship was the main function of a large asset manager, and all players in the investment value chain needed to encourage them to get more resources to do that.

“Asset managers have tendencies to have a corporate governance department which is separate from portfolio management, they are not integrated despite how much they say it is true.”

Leave a Comment

NZ Super cuts benchmark return expectation on US valuation concerns

NZ Super cuts benchmark return expectation on US valuation concerns

A view that the US stock market is overvalued and equity risk premia will be lower over the long term has driven New Zealand Super to lower the return expectations for its reference portfolio following its recent five-yearly review of the benchmark. Co-chief investment officer Brad Dunstan also flags underweight commodity exposure as an area to address and explains why the fund remains sceptical of illiquidity premia despite seeing a growing case for private markets.

Sort content by

The path to net zero

Investors from Brunel, Wespath and Robeco talk about the challenges of shaping their net zero portfolios including data, benchmarks and holding managers to account.

The missing link: EM green bonds

Sustainability bonds issued by sovereign governments in developing and emerging markets offer exciting investor opportunities. The proceeds are used for impact and allow investors to target real change in sectors like health and education. Emerging market specialists describe how it could be the missing link to the ESG jigsaw.

Diversity: How to move the needle

Targets, allocating to diverse managers and acting on calls for change from diverse staffers are just some of the ways asset owners are boosting diversity in their own organisations. Investors at the Kresge Foundation, AP2 and AIMCo talk about their diversity, equity and inclusion action.

Bridgewater on the impact revolution

Integrating impact alongside risk and return is a revolution that will see more diversification among investor allocations to asset classes such as commodities. Elsewhere, it requires using multiple data sets to analyse stocks and sovereign bond allocations to see the real-world impact of a company’s product or services, and which governments are heading to net-zero. Bridgewater’s head of investment research Karen Karniol-Tambour explains.

Diversity doesn’t work without inclusion

Achieving diversity requires data, new recruitment practices and nurturing inclusion. And the financial industry must get its own house in order to better put pressure on investee companies.

Regulation and economics converge in ESG

Investors from Schroders, Trillium and PensionDanmark discuss how a changing regulatory picture and the economics of sustainable investment are coming together to create a tipping point in ESG, but they warn their peers to look beyond the label to what is on the inside.

Previous