Canada, The Netherlands lead the way on pension transparency

Canada is a standout in the transparency of pension fund reporting, topping the list of countries for the third year in a row, with a score of 83, and eight points clear of the next best country score.

In a benchmarking first, all five assessed Canadian funds feature in the top 10, with an average improvement in this year’s score of eight points, showcasing that improvements can be made even when funds are already demonstrating best practice.

The top five countries were rounded out by The Netherlands, Australia, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Australia was the single biggest country improver, increasing its country score by 10 points, and making its way into the top three by nudging out Sweden.

CEM Benchmarking product lead for transparency benchmarking Edsart Heuberger said Australia’s country improvements were driven by AustralianSuper’s better performance, and by Australian Retirement Trust, a fund created from the merger of QSuper and Sunsuper, scoring much higher than QSuper alone did last year.

Sponsored Content

As well as ranking first among the countries reviewed, Canadian funds collectively were the best funds for disclosure around governance and performance. Dutch funds also deserve an honourable mention: collectively they provided the best disclosures on cost and responsible investing.

The past three years has seen gains in transparency across all factors but there is still room for improvement, particularly when it comes to transparency of disclosure around costs.

“Leading countries excel in different areas,” CEM’s Heuberger says.

“Canadians have terrific reporting on governance and investment performance, the Dutch are world-class on costs, and the Nordics excel in responsible investing.

“Generally, funds would gain the most by improving their external investment cost and responsible investing disclosures.”

The GPTB does not account for different regulatory regimes, but it acknowledges that different regulators are driving different disclosure requirements that could impact fund disclosures and comparability.

This is seen particularly in the cost factor, where the top three scores were held by The Netherlands, Canada and Australia. The primary distinguishing factor of these leading funds is the strict regulatory environment that they operate in. (See story on factor scores.)

The Global Pension Transparency Benchmark is a collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CEM Benchmarking and a world-first global benchmark measuring the transparency of disclosures of 15 pension systems across the value-generating measures of cost, governance, performance and responsible investments

It ranks countries on public disclosures of key value-generation elements for the five largest pension fund organisations within each country.


The country rankings are now in their third year, with the scores of the 75 underlying funds published for the second time this year.

The GPTB focuses on the transparency and quality of public disclosures with quality relating to the completeness, clarity, information value and comparability of disclosures.

The overall scores and rankings are measured by assessing hundreds of underlying components and analysing more than 13,000 data points.

For all the scores and rankings by country, fund and factor click here

 

 

Leave a Comment

CPP Investments, NBIM reflect on lessons from a 5-year transparency journey

CPP Investments, NBIM reflect on lessons from a 5-year transparency journey

The Global Pension Transparency Benchmark has been a driving force in improved transparency of disclosures and reporting among global asset owners. As the project comes to its close after five years, two leading funds reflect on why transparency has been a clear focus for their organisations. 

Sort content by

GPTB highlights transparency gaps

The Global Pension Transparency Benchmark has revealed the need for serious improvement in pension transparency across the globe.

Benchmark will help build trust

Transparency is an important link in improving pension delivery, and the Global Pension Transparency Benchmark will help lift transparency standards and ultimately trust in pension institutions, according to its advisory board.

Pension transparency needs a benchmark

A new Global Pension Transparency Benchmark – the first formal collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CEM Benchmarking - will launch in February 2021 ranking countries, via their underlying pension funds, on four factors: governance and organization; performance; costs; and responsible investing.

Asset owners report half of all costs

Asset owners are reporting only half of their true total costs according to analysis by CEM Benchmarking exclusively for Top1000funds.com. This means tens of billions of dollars across the industry is not being reported. The authors look at case studies and make suggestions for industry best practice.

Canadians more complex than first glance

The Canadian model, revered world over for its supreme pension management, is not low cost despite that being one of its oft-described traits. New research by CEM Benchmarking and McGill University shows that these funds are cost efficient, rather than being low cost. Their aim is to be high net performers, not low cost.

What past market crashes teach us

Looking back at the portfolios of large institutional investors during and after the dot.com crash and the GFC, CEM Benchmarking, reveals commonality in the portfolios that thrived. For both events the top quartile returns were more than 2 per cent higher than the bottom quartile. Analysing the asset allocation and behaviour of investors showed two clear themes: top quartile performers had more defensive allocations pre-crash; and rebalancing is a tailwind for performance.