GIC evolves TPA in investment framework overhaul centred on economic drivers and flexibility

GIC has further refined its total portfolio approach by moving to a strategic portfolio focused on underlying factors that drive returns. Split between equities, fixed income and real assets, the revision means the fund can move more easily between private and public exposures and nimbly between asset classes.

In its 2026 annual report, GIC said the three new broad buckets will focus capital allocations on capturing global growth (equities), navigating uncertain rate environments (fixed income) and enhancing resilience against inflationary shocks (real assets).

The fund overhauled its investment framework after 13 years, terminating its 65/35 equities-to-bonds reference portfolio as the fund looks to be “better adapted to the changing investment conditions”.

Since April, GIC has adopted a new two-pronged investment framework consisting of this strategic portfolio and the GIC portfolio. It’s a departure from the legacy framework which was a three-tiered structure consisting of the reference portfolio, the policy portfolio and the active portfolio.

The new framework will push it towards “stronger active management and skill-based strategies”, GIC said in its annual report and allows for more granular asset allocation and capturing opportunities during market dislocations.

GIC believes the upcoming investment environment is one that will be defined by more protectionist government policies around critical sectors, continued challenge to US exceptionalism but a lack of equally mature markets, and uncertainties around the AI-driven productivity boost.

Sponsored Content

The fund tipped higher and more volatile inflation alongside a possible increase in global bond supply given the rising sovereign debt, which means a continuation of higher bond yields compared to the pre-COVID era. 

“Low term premia suggest that medium-term risks around both inflation and deteriorating fiscal dynamics are not yet fully priced in,” the fund said in the annual report.

“In response, our fixed income and multi-asset department is increasingly focused on multi-asset investing. The broadening of investment capabilities in cross-asset macro and multi-asset credit will enable them to better navigate the evolving investment landscape.”

In the legacy set-up, the reference portfolio sat across the top and served as a risk appetite guideline of GIC’s client, which is the Singapore government. The policy and active portfolios together made up the actual GIC portfolio, with the former comprising allocation among six core asset classes and the latter representing “active, skill-based” strategies aimed at outperforming the policy portfolio.

Since adopting this setup 13 years ago, active strategies contributed 52 basis points of gross alpha above the policy portfolio.

GIC stopped the long-term practice of publishing the performance of its reference portfolio this year. But in its 2025 disclosure, GIC portfolio’s annualised nominal return in US dollars over 20 years (5.7 per cent) underperformed the reference portfolio (6.2 per cent).

Now the new strategic portfolio will become the client risk and long-term return guideline, though the specific target split between equities, fixed income and real assets isn’t disclosed.

It essentially leaves the fund with more flexibility to allocate capital – for example, it can now more easily shift capital between public and private equities without separate equities baskets, and capture infrastructure and real estate more effectively across the physical asset spectrum.

The GIC portfolio, meanwhile, will include alternatives investments and strategies designed to add value to the strategic portfolio through “granular asset allocation, bottom-up security selection, and value creation”.

“This [new investment framework] demands stronger active management and skill-based strategies,” the fund said in the annual report.

In terms of total fund exposure, equities continue to represent the biggest piece of the pie at 53 per cent – a slight increase from last year – while fixed income and real assets both dipped compared to last year and each sat at 22 per cent at the end of March.

Investments in Americas claim over half (53 per cent) of the portfolio, followed by APAC (22 per cent) and EMEA (19 per cent).

GIC reports its return on a 20-year annualised rolling basis, with that number sitting at a six-year low of 3.4 per cent at the end of March. In US dollar nominal return terms, the annualised rate was 5.6 per cent.

Leave a Comment

CPP: Why doing the right thing in TPA can look like losing

CPP: Why doing the right thing in TPA can look like losing

CPP Investments has argued that a TPA portfolio has a high chance of appearing to have underperformed when evaluated against traditional SAA benchmarks, even when the underlying investment decisions are sound. In a recent paper, the fund argues TPA portfolios should be judged on a broader scorecard.

Sort content by

How leading asset owners maintain TPA discipline

Rolling out a total portfolio approach is rarely a linear process, as even its most experienced practitioners warned that without careful resistance to old language, culture and structure, asset owners can easily slide back into the “comfort” of strategic asset allocation. A new report unpacks how leading funds stay disciplined.

South Carolina lifts private equity and credit as cashflow turns positive

The South Carolina Retirement System Investment Commission's improved liquidity position has allowed the plan to tilt its portfolio towards unlisted asset classes, including private equity and private credit. The fund grew fast thanks to funding reform, improved salaries, and positive investment returns and is now looking to boost long-term performance.

Debt beats equity in data centre boom as scarce capital lifts credit yields

Asset owners continue to weigh up the shifting risk-return attributes of the booming data centre sector including deal structures, refinancing, energy requirements, and the future of AI.

Why CalPERS doesn’t want to miss the climate revolution

If CalPERS had put more money into the Silicon Valley companies in its own backyard earlier it might be fully funded by now, jokes its sustainable investment head. But it won’t miss the same opportunities in climate investing.

AI beyond the black box

The artificial intelligence revolution is taking place against a backdrop of rising fiscal deficits and a realignment of the geopolitical order. Applying cutting-edge AI technology to navigate markets is helping asset managers such as Bridgewater make sense of a shifting landscape.

Chicken, beef or vegetables: assessing the real environmental impact of AI

The inexorable rise of AI is increasing energy demand around the globe, but the technology itself is also enabling greater efficiencies. Assessing its real impact requires an understanding of both its “footprint” and its “handprint”, and its impact may not be as dire as we’ve been led to believe.

Previous