CalSTRS looks at big picture with total portfolio function

The $315 billion CalSTRS is looking to build a top-down portfolio function to better incorporate liquidity management alongside portfolio construction and to consider how it can better deal with often lumpy cashflows to maximise returns, while continuing to keep a tight rein on risk.

CalSTRS is developing a new top-down total portfolio function to better incorporate liquidity management alongside portfolio construction.

Deputy chief investment officer Scott Chan says the fund is at the early stages of enhancing its liquidity oversight and is building the teams and tools to centralise that function.

“Portfolio construction is at the heart of how we look at liquidity oversight, as a tool to enhance how you construct the portfolio. They go hand in hand,” he told Top1000funds.com in an interview.

“But it is integrating these components into the portfolio construction that is the hard part. You need all of your private and public markets working together and that’s hard for organisations to get right.”

Chan says the fund already has significant experience and tools for liquidity management across the various divisions, but the maturation of the portfolio meant evolving and enhancing the liquidity function was important.

Sponsored Content

The fund has a mature member profile and it pays more in benefits than it receives in contributions. In addition, a two-decades old private markets allocation means cashflows need smoothing.

“We have been increasing our allocations to private markets over the past two decades which has worked out remarkably well,” Chan says.

“But if you start every year with a negative cashflow and layer on more volatile cashflow there is an ongoing need to manage liquidity. For example, in 2021 we had a ton of cashflows come back from private investments but today not so much.”

CalSTRS’ liquidity priorities are paying benefits, avoiding selling assets at a discount, taking advantage of dislocation opportunities, and building a resilient portfolio that can rebalance to asset-allocation targets and take advantage of opportunities in the event of a recession.

“Liquidity is a tool that enhances your portfolio construction and helps build a resilient portfolio,” Chan says.

“Liquidity is the lifeblood. In this environment it’s becoming more and more important.”

A core goal in the liquidity and leverage management is to smooth out cashflows over a business cycle.

“Some years you get a lot of cash back and others you don’t, it’s lumpy cashflow,” Chan says.

“Over a cycle you can smooth that out using leverage and liquidity tools.

“We are not intending to take on permanent amounts of leverage, thinking of it more as a way to enhance the portfolio construction over a business cycle.”

Chan says the intention is that balance sheet/liquidity management will add to the existing investment strategy and risk unit which already looks after asset allocation.

A team will be hired, from both internal and external resources, and sit under a head of total portfolio management.

“It will be really critical to get this right,” Chan says.

“It is important to integrate this tightly and weave it into portfolio construction. It will be a multi-year evolution and phasing. Our organisation needs to mature into the idea of how we enhance the liquidity management.”

Chan says it is not just the technology and resources that need to evolve, but the governance structure as well.

“As we evolve we will continue to build out those risk processes,” he says.

“And we will have to build out further governance too, related to how we make the decisions. It’s going to be a multi-staged evolution for us.”

ALM and asset allocation evolution

The $315 billion fund recently went through an asset/liability exercise and made three significant changes to its asset allocation.

The global equities allocation was reduced by 4 percentage points with 2 per cent of that going to a new private debt allocation. The fund had previously invested in private lending through its innovation bucket and this is the first time that it has had its own allocation.

“Private credit is an incredible opportunity today,” Chan says.

“When you think about the portfolio of the future, here you have something near mid-teens returns and you are high in the capital structure, which is better in a recession. It is a critical part of our asset allocation going forward.”

CalSTRS’ innovation portfolio has been an incubation bucket for many asset classes that now have their own, more permanent allocation like private credit, inflation-sensitive assets and the risk-mitigating strategies bucket, which is where global macro, CTAs and other risk-mitigation hedge funds sit.

That bucket is now going to be expanded to consider other opportunities to add to diversification.

“We’re looking at how we can design greater flexibility to the portfolio,” Chan says.

“For example if there is a recession can we take advantage of the opportunities.

“The innovation portfolio has done well historically. Bonds might have returned 1.7 per cent over the last 10 years and we got a lot more return out of the asset classes [in the innovation bucket] and got diversification. We will continue to expand that opportunities bucket to flow into different areas. It gives us that flexibility that’s important in portfolio construction and asset allocation because the market is a lot more uncertain.”

It also allocated a further 1 per cent to private equity, taking it to 14 per cent, and another 1 per cent to infrastructure.

CalSTRS had a one-year return to June 30 of 6.17 per cent and a three-year return of 10.1 per cent, well above the actuarial rate of return of 7 per cent.

Leave a Comment

What comes next for US-China relations

What comes next for US-China relations

Investors should expect more friction between Washington and Beijing over technology and Taiwan in the years ahead, according to Jake Sullivan, former national security advisor to Vice President Biden during the Obama administration. Meanwhile, the rise of middle powers is a geopolitical theme to watch.

Sort content by

LGPS Central doubles in size; looks to add more alternatives

In a rare interview, Jayne Atkinson, chief investment officer of the £100 billion ($132 billion) UK pool LGPS Central, reveals the plan to scale up its offering after almost doubling its assets under management, including expanding alternatives to new allocations in hedge funds, diversified growth funds and insurance-linked securities.

NBIM dethrones GPIF to become the world’s largest asset owner

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is now the world’s largest asset owner according to the Thinking Ahead Institute's annual Asset Owner 100 report, which also outlines the similarities and challenges among top capital allocators globally. 

Sweden’s AP2 and AP6 conflict over PE investments

The Swedish government’s plans to streamline the country’s pension system and merge the $8 billion buffer fund AP6 with its larger and more diversified sibling, the $48 billion AP2, have hit a bump in the road. Major points of contention include AP6's large private equity exposures and staff integration. 

Iceland’s pension funds: Consolidation continues but size of sector a worry

Merger mania continues to grip Iceland’s pension sector, but economies of scale and greater efficiency don't solve the problem of the size of an industry now larger than the country's banking system and insurance sector combined, and more than sufficient to buy all listed investments.

CalPERS bets on outperformance from growing climate allocation

CalPERS' Peter Cashion tells Top1000funds.com how the pension fund's strategy to allocate to climate mitigation, transition and adaptation strategies is allowing it to access an untapped corner of the US market where many investors have retreated because of the policy environment.

Climate politics: BlackRock hits back at NYC Comptroller

The skirmish between the New York City Comptroller and BlackRock over climate alignment of the city’s public pension funds – a fight worth a $42 billion mandate to BlackRock – highlights the complexity and impracticality of aligning climate expectations, reporting requirements and business imperatives.

Previous