Why diversity is important: Calif. funds

“Our goal is to build a more diverse and inclusive investment industry culture with a specific focus on current CalPERS and CalSTRS external investment managers and staff,” enthused Ben Meng, CalPERS CIO speaking after the recent 2019 CalPERS and CalSTRS Diversity Forum.

The two California-based pension funds, with a combined assets under management of $580 billion, invited over 400 attendees from academia, business, and investment to Sacramento to explore the connection between diversity, human capital and performance, touching particularly on how diversity and inclusion drives value both in investment management and corporations.

In a series of engaging keynotes and panels, the forum celebrated best practice and new research and gave participants tangible next steps on how to increase diversity within their workplace and fresh momentum to push the diversity cause.

“The Forum is an opportunity for investment professionals to come together and collectively address a challenge that we as an entire industry face,” said CalSTRS CIO Chris Ailman.

The investment industry’s lack of diversity remains a critical issue, not only morally but also for its own long-term success, given the wide recognition that diversity of thought leads to better risk adjusted outcomes and better investment decisions.

Yet Ailman, who oversees a strategy that includes around $12 billion AUM with emerging managers (equivalent to around 10 percent of the fund’s externally managed assets) and an internal headcount whereby half of CalSTRS non-administrative investments staff identify as ethnically diverse – important since around 50 percent of assets are managed internally –  insists the diversity message is getting through to the industry.

Sponsored Content

“I’m not seeing any fatigue, just the opposite,” he said, crediting particularly the efforts of the CFA Institute’s Diversity & Inclusion project.”

As a unique addition to this year’s event, the CFA institute led workshop sessions focused on giving participants the chance to work with their industry peers to generate and share ideas around improving diversity and inclusion in their own firms.

Similarly, Meng and his team also note continued progress.

“While we cannot speak for the whole investment industry, the external investment managers we talked to in preparing for the forum seem more concerned and engaged on diversity than they were two years ago. Managers are developing and implementing new diversity and inclusion initiatives and increasingly using data to better determine what is working and what is not,” he said.

 

Leadership from the top

 

Leadership from the top is a key solution to solving the diversity problem, said Meng.

“Commitment to diversity and inclusion from senior leaders fosters an inclusive and respectful culture, increasing the pipeline at all levels.”

According to CalPERS website, 44 per cent of the pension fund’s executives are female, 40 per cent of its senior leaders are female and 70 per cent of its team leaders are female. Data collection and reporting, and continued research are also important tools, he adds.

“Asking about human capital topics during the due diligence process for new mandates for external managers sends an important signal from asset owners to asset managers; asking about how the external managers ensure diversity of thought in investment decision-making is important.”

It’s not only leadership. Diversity must be embedded in beliefs, said Ailman who argues that diversity and inclusion must become a core value and “the norm” supported at the highest levels in all sectors of the investment community.

“This same standard should be applied whether examining makeup of corporations or looking for the next asset manager.” However, he does note that diverging definitions of diversity muddy the water. “The definition of diversity is evolving, and no two people have the same definition. Organizations need to identify what diversity means to them. Once this crucial step is complete, organisations can then better focus their efforts and more effectively measure results.” Diversity is a long-term commitment where change doesn’t occur overnight, he concludes.

“We hope that after the Forum, attendees will return to their respective organisations with renewed conviction to move towards a highly diverse and inclusive workforce.”

Leave a Comment

Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Climate is by far the number one sustainability priority for investors in 2021 according to a poll of asset owners from more than 32 countries which came together for the Top1000funds.com online Sustainability event in March.

Sort content by

Diversity Impact Score

Throughout its history, the U.S. domestic Asset Management Industry, projected by PwC to grow to $71.2 trillion in assets under management by 20251, has exhibited an empirical lack of diversity with respect to gender and ethnicity within its ranks. Numerous studies have shown that Women and People of Color (“POC”) are underrepresented in the Industry, including a 2019 study commissioned by the Knight Foundation finding that Asset Management firms owned substantially or majority-owned by Women or POC managed only 1.3% of the Industry’s total assets under management.

Sustainability in the time of Covid-19

2020 underlined just how closely connected the world is. The pandemic broke out in a market in China but quickly spread to the rest of the world. The health crisis soon escalated into a serious economic crisis – a crisis of which we still do not know the full consequences of. Being able to act quickly and safely in a changing world is more important than ever. Many of PensionDanmark’s members and companies have endured periods of lockdown, and jobs have been lost as a consequence. The hotel and restaurant industry, the transport industry and the many employees at Denmark’s airports have been particularly hard hit. Many of the companies that were not shut down had to implement restrictions and other measures to protect themselves against COVID-19.

Asset Owner Technical Guide: Selection

The incorporation of ESG factors within the investment process has evolved from a nice-to-have to a necessity. Client demand has grown strongly, with 68% of the PRI’s asset owner signatory base addressing ESG considerations in their requests for proposals (RFPs). This means that many asset owners expect investment managers to include financially material ESG factors within their funds and investment strategies. In addition, policy makers around the world are introducing regulatory requirements for both investment managers and asset owners to disclose and report on responsible investment practices.

Asset Owner Technical Guide: Monitoring

A growing number of asset owners now expect their investment managers to incorporate ESG factors into their investment processes. This means that ESG needs to be at the core of the relationship between the asset owner and the investment manager – and that ESG considerations need to be addressed at every stage of that relationship, from setting the initial investment strategy, to drafting requests for proposals, to selection, appointment and monitoring.

Asset Owner Technical Guide: Appointment

Asset owners increasingly include ESG considerations in their investment management agreements (IMAs) and other legal documentation. More than two-thirds (69%) of PRI asset owner signatories typically implement ESG requirements in contracts such as IMAs and limited partner agreements (LPAs).1 To ensure that investment managers abide by their clients’ ESG requirements, certain legal aspects are becoming standard features of the asset owner-investment manager relationship.

A Greener Fiscal Future

With fiscal policy now the dominant lever supporting growth in most economies, it has become even more important to understand how the various fiscal policies will flow through to GDP, inflation, and different markets. We have been working to get our understanding of fiscal policy to the same level as our understanding of monetary policy. This is a difficult task, as fiscal comes in so many forms, each having different implications at the macro and micro levels. Some policies can be clearly counter-cyclical (the best of these are typically direct checks and shovel-ready infrastructure), while others aim to address more structural problems (like low productivity or environmental issues) but are less effective cyclically, as they are typically longer-term.

Previous