Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Cracked Ground From The Indian Subcontinent

Climate is by far the number one sustainability priority for investors in 2021 according to a poll of asset owners from more than 32 countries which came together for the Top1000funds.com online Sustainability event in March.

According to the polling at the event, 79 per cent of investors say climate is their number one ESG priority for the year, followed at a large distance by diversity (19 per cent) and labour rights (2 per cent).

The investors resoundingly said they thought the COVID-19 crisis had accelerated the need to address the sustainable development goals, with 87 per cent of investors agreeing this. This is up from the Sustainability conference six months earlier in September last year when 74 per cent of delegates said the crisis had been a conduit for addressing the SDGs.

The conference heard that sustainable bonds in emerging and frontier markets could unlock the growth in emerging markets, and could override volatile electoral cycles and target funds in social areas like education and climate change that have held back development with a material impact on growth.

Of the investors surveyed at the conference, 56 per cent of investors said they would invest in sustainable bonds in those markets in the next 12 months.

Sponsored Content

Of those that won’t, it was predominately due to only having an equities exposure in those markets, but also some investors were concerned the exposure would be too narrow (7 per cent).

The conference looked at diversity, equity and inclusion, with much attention being paid to DEI both internally and externally among asset managers by the investors attending the conference.

According to polling 75 per cent of investors have between 10-30 per cent women in the makeup of their investment teams. 20 per cent had between 30-40 per cent, and only 5 per cent had 40-50 per cent. None of the investors at the conference had more than 50 per cent women in their investment team.

Externally however, 59 per cent of the investors said that they hold their asset managers to account on DEI issues, with a further 18 per cent revealing they plan to in the next 12 months. A further 24 per cent just said they don’t.

Impact investing and the evolution from a risk/return to risk/return/outcome framework was also a theme discussed at the conference.

Investors were asked what percentage of their portfolio also looked at impact alongside risk and return and 38 per cent said 5 per cent of their portfolio, 25 per ent said in more than half of their portfolio, 19 per cent said in their whole portfolio, while 13 per cent were not pursuing impact at all in their portfolio.

The polling of investors revealed the importance of data when it comes to decision making in sustainability.

Investors were asked what most stands in their way to pursue more impact through their portfolio of public market assets, with 43 per cent said the availability of reliable and consistent data was standing in their way.

Others said it was the availability of sustainable investments at scale (19 per cent), a concern about giving up return (14 per cent) and communication with members and stakeholders (10 per cent).

For more coverage of the Sustainability Digital conference, including session recordings and stories, visit the content hub.

Leave a Comment

The dangers of funding sedition

The dangers of funding sedition

Scott Kalb and CalSTRS' Aeisha Mastagni discuss what is next for investor action in sustainability. They reflect on the dangers of funding sedition following the 6th January riots. Investors rarely consider the risk of investee companies financing extreme groups, but it threatens the very system on which institutional investment relies.

Sort content by

How to avoid funding treason

The siege on the US Capitol has revealed asset owners may be investing in companies that work with or fund extremist groups. To protect their organisations, their stakeholders, and their savers from such risks, asset owners should consider revising their ESG frameworks to include disclosure and accountability policies on corporate political spending.

Amazon under fire

Two of the world’s largest asset owners are putting pressure on Amazon to reveal exactly how it is protecting its workers from COVID-19. It’s a move indicative of the investor mood to focus attention on human and labour rights among investee companies, with a particular spotlight on the tech sector.

Diversity: The data challenge of 2020s

Assessing, managing and changing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) is set to become the data issue of the 2020s, as asset owners turn their attention to the power they have to advocate for change in the companies they invest in, and the firms that manage their money.

Climate risk is investment risk: Fink

The reallocation of capital towards sustainable companies is happening in real time and will accelerate, according to Larry Fink who is investing in technology and people to develop systems that can prove “climate risk is investment risk”.

Climate problem and industry ownership

Tim Hodgson, co-head of the Thinking Ahead Group, goes through an elaborate exercise to determine how much of the climate problem the institutional investment industry owns. The first step, he says, in finding a solution.

Verification essential for more impact

A new impact investing verification, which uses the same level of rigor that institutional investors approach the due diligence of fund managers, promises to unlock capital flows into impact and build the necessary scale with integrity needed to address the urgent social, environmental, and economic challenges.

Previous