Nordhaus and ‘No Regrets’

Nobel Prize winner Professor William Nordhaus, Sterling Professor of Economics and Professor of Forestry and Environmental Studies at Yale University, explains his theory of ‘No Regrets’ whereby companies can integrate ESG at a level that brings real benefits for society but has limited impact on the corporate.

Companies integrating ESG need to examine how they deal with the harmful externalities that they generate. By reducing the damaging spill overs of corporate activity like pollution, but without huge financial costs or damaging shareholder value lies at the heart of ESG integration, said Professor William Nordhaus, Sterling Professor of Economics and Professor of Forestry and Environmental Studies at Yale University.

Speaking at “Sustainability Digital: A Planet in Trouble” the recipient of the 2018 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences outlined the arguments in his book “The Spirit of Green,” explaining that ESG holds so many concepts and ideas it is easy to become muddled. By looking at ESG through the lens of reducing externalities that benefit society without real corporate harm brings clarity.

Nordhaus used the analogy of turning down a thermostat to explain how corporates can introduce a policy of ‘No Regrets.’ The heating is still on, just a notch lower so that “we don’t’ feel the difference” but it has a “substantial difference” on externalities.

“We can make substantial contributions to reducing footprints in a win for society at small cost for firms.”

Nordhaus said that many firms achieve a win-win, where good management and governance brings benefits to both the firm and society. Challenges come for companies that act in the interests of society in a way that impacts the company negatively. However, a small reduction in a firm’s carbon footprint has a substantial impact on others. He said that “modest” ESG integration that reduces externalities increases shareholder value in a way that is also a “win-win” that does not mean a company will lose out. It has a benefit for society and comes at a low cost to the firm – and does not trigger a shareholder revolt.

Sponsored Content

Nordhaus said that investors should choose portfolio companies that apply this principle, selecting companies that reduce their carbon footprint at a low cost and designing portfolios that have lower impact. He said this approach would allow investors to reduce their portfolio imprint “with minimal loss” and he urged investors to “intervene with managers” to design portfolios for lower impact.

Carbon price?

Nordhaus, who outlined his argument for a carbon tax last year, told delegates that he believes a price on carbon is more likely under the Biden administration. However, he said it wouldn’t happen in the near future.

“It requires legislation and a majority in the House and Senate,” he said. He does believe US federal regulations are likely around auto emissions, however.

“I would be very surprised if this was not introduced,” he said.

He also urged governments to facilitate innovation in low carbon technology. The “radical” and “deep change” needed to reach net zero by the middle of the century requires a new landscape of innovation fuelled by a price structure where innovation pays off.

“Profit orientated firms need to have a price structure that reflects this priority,” he said, urging for a price structure that incentivizes private actors to conduct research. “The battery people know what to do; they just need an incentive,” he said.

In broad concluding comments, he said that corporations are increasingly viewed as members of society with economic and ethical obligations. He said ESG integration involves mostly voluntary actions, and said the idea that profits are the “central goal” for businesses is a “misleading compass” that needs correcting. He said containing the impact of climate change is possible if we go about it efficiently and at a low cost, focusing on corporate externalities. “We don’t’ have to go back to the Stone Age,” he said. “You don’t cure a pandemic by holding up in the house. You do it with a vaccine.”

Leave a Comment

Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Climate is by far the number one sustainability priority for investors in 2021 according to a poll of asset owners from more than 32 countries which came together for the Top1000funds.com online Sustainability event in March.

Sort content by

Sustainability in the time of Covid-19

2020 underlined just how closely connected the world is. The pandemic broke out in a market in China but quickly spread to the rest of the world. The health crisis soon escalated into a serious economic crisis – a crisis of which we still do not know the full consequences of. Being able to act quickly and safely in a changing world is more important than ever. Many of PensionDanmark’s members and companies have endured periods of lockdown, and jobs have been lost as a consequence. The hotel and restaurant industry, the transport industry and the many employees at Denmark’s airports have been particularly hard hit. Many of the companies that were not shut down had to implement restrictions and other measures to protect themselves against COVID-19.

Asset Owner Technical Guide: Selection

The incorporation of ESG factors within the investment process has evolved from a nice-to-have to a necessity. Client demand has grown strongly, with 68% of the PRI’s asset owner signatory base addressing ESG considerations in their requests for proposals (RFPs). This means that many asset owners expect investment managers to include financially material ESG factors within their funds and investment strategies. In addition, policy makers around the world are introducing regulatory requirements for both investment managers and asset owners to disclose and report on responsible investment practices.

Asset Owner Technical Guide: Monitoring

A growing number of asset owners now expect their investment managers to incorporate ESG factors into their investment processes. This means that ESG needs to be at the core of the relationship between the asset owner and the investment manager – and that ESG considerations need to be addressed at every stage of that relationship, from setting the initial investment strategy, to drafting requests for proposals, to selection, appointment and monitoring.

Asset Owner Technical Guide: Appointment

Asset owners increasingly include ESG considerations in their investment management agreements (IMAs) and other legal documentation. More than two-thirds (69%) of PRI asset owner signatories typically implement ESG requirements in contracts such as IMAs and limited partner agreements (LPAs).1 To ensure that investment managers abide by their clients’ ESG requirements, certain legal aspects are becoming standard features of the asset owner-investment manager relationship.

A Greener Fiscal Future

With fiscal policy now the dominant lever supporting growth in most economies, it has become even more important to understand how the various fiscal policies will flow through to GDP, inflation, and different markets. We have been working to get our understanding of fiscal policy to the same level as our understanding of monetary policy. This is a difficult task, as fiscal comes in so many forms, each having different implications at the macro and micro levels. Some policies can be clearly counter-cyclical (the best of these are typically direct checks and shovel-ready infrastructure), while others aim to address more structural problems (like low productivity or environmental issues) but are less effective cyclically, as they are typically longer-term.

A new era of ESG under Biden

Against all odds, there is an air of optimism in 2021. We have entered a new era in US politics, and the inauguration of the Biden-Harris administration brings renewed hope for sustainable investment, particularly climate policy. So what can investors expect?

Previous