What China’s index inclusion means

The inclusion of China A-shares in the wider MSCI indexes, an inevitable outcome, will have a profound effect on investors’ portfolios. The steps China needs to make to satisfy investors, and the implications of inclusion, will be discussed at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Yale School of Management in October.

MSCI announced in June it would delay the inclusion of China A-shares in its emerging markets index. Around $1.5 trillion is benchmarked to this index.

The current proposal, which has not yet been approved, is for a partial or 5 per cent inclusion. This would see the number of constituents increasing from 155 (overseas listed Chinese companies) to 609.

A potential full inclusion of China would mean an abolishment of the quota system, full liberalisation of capital mobility restrictions and alignment of international accessibility standards. If these requirements were met, a full inclusion would mean China would make up nearly 40 per cent of the emerging markets index. This could have a huge impact on investors’ portfolios.

In announcing the delay, Remy Briand, MSCI’s global head of research, said that international institutional investors had indicated they wanted to see further improvements in the accessibility of the China A-shares market before its inclusion. This included investors’ ability to move funds in and out of China and a desire to see whether new stock suspension rules were enforced.

MSCI has said it would review China-A shares again next year, but did not rule out a potential inclusion before then if changes were made.

Sponsored Content

Briand will be part of a discussion on the impact on investors’ portfolios of the inclusion of China in the emerging market index at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Yale School of Management from October 23-25.

Also joining the discussion will be Professor of Finance at Yale, Zhiwu Chen, who is an expert on finance theory, securities valuation, emerging markets, and China’s economy and capital markets.

For the past 15 years Chen has focused on investigating market development and institution-building issues in the context of China’s transition process and other emerging markets.

He asks: What institutions are necessary for markets to develop? Why is finance important for society? How does financial development affect social structure and individual freedom?

The panel will also hear from Stephen Kotkin, Professor in History and International Affairs at Princeton University, who specialises in geopolitical risk and will explore the history of China and its influence in the world.

David Tien, senior portfolio manager within global tactical asset allocation at the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board will explore the impact on broader equity markets of China’s declining growth, and the impact on investors when China’s share of the broader market indexes increase.

 

 

For the full program and to register for the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Yale School of Management from October 23-25 visit www.fiduciaryinvestors.com

One response to “What China’s index inclusion means”

  1. This arictle is a home run, pure and simple!

Leave a Comment

Florida: Opportunities in a crisis

Florida: Opportunities in a crisis

The Florida State Board of Administration has made some strategic moves to take advantage of opportunities in the dislocation, including in private equity, distressed debt and active listed equities.. But CIO, Ash Williams, is concerned about the underlying real economy.

Sort content by

Inequality risk equal to climate change

Rebecca Henderson, the John and Natty McArthur University Professor at Harvard University who co-teaches Reimagining Capitalism at HBS, says inequality is equal to climate risk in its potential impact. She told delegates at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Harvard University when a system no longer generates freedom and prosperity it must be changed. Change is possible because we have the resources and technology to do it. A first move is decent jobs for people at the “bottom”.

America, China and Donald Trump

As trade wars between the US and China dominate financial markets, Princeton historian Stephen Kotkin has assured pension funds that the world order that has been in place since World War II remains intact.

Understanding US/China relations

Understanding the fractious relationship between US and China is more important– and simultaneously more confronting – than it has been in the past, according to Stephen Kotkin, professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University. While the China investment challenge has always been to capture the aspirational middleclass, the high-profile historian says “the big money that’s going to be made in China is going to be made from the dislocation”.

What can the past teach us?

Institutional investors' investment strategy should be serving the China middle class and the dislocation from within Asia, according to Stephen Kotkin,Professor of History and International Affairs at Princeton University speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Cambridge University. He explored what the geopolitical conflicts of the past can teach us about the future. He looked at some of the key points in history, how China, the European Union and the US have survived, and what it means for the future.

A ‘Sputnik Moment’ with China?

Whither United States-China? Stephen Kotkin, Professor in History and International Affairs at Princeton University and adviser to conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, discusses the changing nature of the complex relationship between the US and China and the struggle underway as these two large economies find their positions in the economic and technological hierarchy. So what should investors watch for?

Taiwan epicentre of geopolitical risk

The China-US trade war is the latest development in a tense relationship that threatens to bubble over into war over Taiwan, “incinerating” portfolios, Stephen Kotkin said.

Previous