Debunking common myths about European distressed debt

 

Monday 21 May
9:00 – 11:30 am
The Codrington Room, Corinthia Hotel London
Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2BD
United Kingdom 

 

Over the next several years, it is estimated that European banks need to dispose of approximately €2.5 trillion of non-core assets. The €800 billion “firewall” against sovereign debt default in Europe and long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) have eased liquidity stress among the region’s banks, but has not dealt with their solvency issues.

Like US banks, European lenders bought plenty of lower quality, higher yielding debt between 2003 and 2008 to support leveraged buy-outs, real estate deals and structured financial products. They are now under significant pressure to sell these, and other, assets as a result of upcoming Basel III regulation, the need to reduce reliance on wholesale funding and requirements from the EU and local governments. For the first time, Europe is experiencing a distressed debt cycle of vast proportions.

This presents a compelling opportunity for investors. However some widely believed myths are preventing private capital from investing in European corporate distressed debt.

Banks are unwilling to sell assets at distressed prices due to weak balance sheets

Sponsored Content

The truth is that a number of European banks are selling distressed assets, but this is not necessarily visible because divestitures are generally less public for a number of reasons. The roundtable will discuss the reality behind this myth, what skills and experience are required to access these sales processes and the size of the actionable distressed debt opportunity.

European insolvency laws make it next to impossible to achieve debt-for-equity swaps

European insolvency laws are varied and complex. Knowledgeable investors carefully select the jurisdictions they work in and know what can and cannot be achieved. The roundtable will compare and contrast legislation in different countries to highlight the most attractive areas and how laws in more difficult countries are evolving.

Unions, laws and culture prevent effective operational restructurings of European companies

Restructurings in Europe are fundamentally different than in the US. European labour laws, unions and culture are important and powerful considerations. We will discuss how it is possible to work constructively with local officials and unions to develop realistic plans which can ensure a company’s long-term viability and maximize employees’ welfare over time while agreeing to appropriate short-term sacrifices.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER YOUR INTEREST

Leave a Comment

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing has come a long way in the past two decades, going from a niche strategy to a $1.5 trillion industry, but there are still challenges for it to reach institutional scale due to the lack of products and insufficient evidence of outperformance in some parts of the market.

Sort content by

Pandemic, recession, economic crisis

COVID-19 has delivered an enormous global shock, leading to steep recessions in many countries. The baseline forecast by the World Bank envisions a 5.2 per cent contraction in global GDP in 2020—the deepest global recession in decades.

The need for urgent action on climate

Nigel Topping who was appointed by the UK Government as the High Level Climate Action Champion for United Nations climate talks, COP26 joins Fiona Reynolds, chief executive of the PRI, in conversation with Amanda White, editor of Top1000funds.com This episode focuses on climate change and how, amongst and despite, the short-term focus of this COVID-19 crisis, we can mobilise government, business and investors into action around this important issue of climate change.

Building better retirement systems

The global COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for better risk management tools to handle longevity and ageing. This paper by Wharton's Olivia Mitchell, offers an assessment of the status quo prior the coronavirus; evaluates how retirement systems are faring in the wake of the shock; examines insurance and financial market products that may render retirement systems more resilient for the world’s ageing population; and looks at the potential role for policymakers.

Embrace a systems framework

COVID-19 has revealed some fundamental design flaws in our global economy, including the relentless pursuit of economic growth - not only at the expense of the environment but also at the expense of people. The investment industry has a role to play in fixing these design flaws. A systems framework for investing could be the answer.

Building back better

For the economic recovery from the COVID-19 crisis to be durable and resilient, a return to ‘business as usual’ and environmentally destructive investment patterns and activities must be avoided. To avoid this, economic recovery packages should be designed to “build back better”.

Fiscal recovery packages and climate

As we move from the rescue to the recovery phase of the COVID-19 response, policy-makers have an opportunity to invest in productive assets for the long-term.

Previous