Penn PSERS trims leverage, adds fixed income and hones in on fees

From this October $71.9 billion Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System, PSERS, will reduce net leverage, add fixed income allocations, and continue to shave costs off its external investment management fees.

The fund is targeting an annual $130 million reduction in fees by “prudently” lowering the private markets target allocation to 30 per cent (it is currently 36 per cent) and taking the absolute return target allocation down to zero from current levels of 4 per cent of assets.

The trimming and shifting of the portfolio comes after the fund decided to adjust its strategic asset allocation in response to significant ongoing market changes.

Typically the board reassesses the SAA every three years (it last adjusted its SAA in 2021) but may consider adjustments during the interim should material changes occur to the underlying economic and capital market assumptions. In a recent board meeting, members heard how the latest decision reflects the fund’s strength and flexibility to adjust to an ever-evolving market environment.

“PSERS has successfully applied a modest amount of leverage over the years to improve diversification and enhance long-term return expectations,” CIO Ben Cotton said in the meeting. “However material changes to underlying return expectations make it practical to reassess our present targets.”

Rising interest rates have made the cost of leverage higher and by extension, the benefits of such leverage less certain, explained Cotton who oversees 65 internal investment professionals and staff.

Sponsored Content

“Reducing net leverage and making the planned reductions to private markets and absolute return allocations also allows us to simplify the overall asset allocation and reduce risk,” he said. “At the same time, we can preserve the fund’s diversification and liquidity while still maintaining sufficient long-term return expectations to hopefully meet or surpass our 7 per cent annual assumed rate of return.”

The absolute return allocation has targeted returns with a low correlation to public financial markets and strategies have included event driven, relative value, tactical trading and long short equity.

Cutting management fees

PSERS commitment to cut fees follows a concerted strategy to reduce management fees in recent years. According to its annual report, investment expenses decreased by $92.7 million from $618.1 million in FY 2021 to $525.4 million in FY 2022. As a percentage of total benefits and expenses, investment expenses have decreased from a high of 8.2 per cent in FY 2013 to 6.2 per cent in FY 2022.

PSERS is renowned among public pension fund peers for its fee transparency. It requests management fee information from each of its limited partnerships and collective trust fund investments, even if it is not specifically disclosed in the fund’s standard reports or identified in capital call requests.

This information includes base and performance fees obtained from either the fund’s administrator statement, capital account statement, or financial statements and is then used to report all relevant management fees in PSERS’ financial statements.

PSERS – one of America’s oldest pension funds, founded in 1917 although it only had assets under management of $6 billion in the early 80s –  has a 40 per cent long term target asset allocation of equity that includes a 12 per cent allocation to private equity. Public equity consists of small, mid large cap US equity (12 per cent) non US equity (16 per cent). PSERS invests around 33 per cent of the portfolio in fixed income, divided between investment grade, public and private credit and US inflation protection

Real assets comprise 29 per cent of the portfolio and includes public and private real estate and infrastructure, commodities and gold.

Leave a Comment

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

As concerns in private credit mount, Colorado PERA CIO and COO Amy McGarrity says the pension fund isn’t seeing any strains in its growing allocation to the asset class, arguing that long-term investors are shielded from the risks because they can lock up their capital to weather market cycles.

Sort content by

The impact of technology on investments

Harshal Chaudhari recently sidestepped from his role as company-wide CIO at IBM, looking after $150 billion in pension assets, to a new role as the tech giant’s chief analytics officer. He spoke to Top1000Funds about the strategy he ran at the pension fund, his wider thoughts on the global economy and the impact of technology on the investment world.

QSuper: standing out from the crowd

QSuper CIO, Brad Holzberger, has long stood out from his peers by loading up on long-term government bonds and even the recent sudden collapse of yields, as investors started pricing in slower growth, hasn’t deterred him from sticking with this asset class. The retiring CIO of one of Australia's largest funds about expectations.

ADIA boosts internal active fixed income

The $700 billion Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, ADIA, is boosting its internal fixed income capabilities and scaling up capacity to run active strategies in-house as it simplifies the portfolio to become more fleet-of-foot.

Finding risk: First State Super

A decade of ultra-low rates and mediocre growth does not mean that every year will yield low returns for investors, according to Damian Graham, the CIO of First State Super one of Australia's largest institutional investors. He talks about how to get enough risk in the portfolio.

Caisse Geneva’s approach to risk

The pension fund for the Swiss Canton of Geneva runs a fundamental investment strategy shaped around harvesting the premia. The fund's CIO, Gregoire Haenni, mindful of heightened risk in the equity allocation because of the late cycle.

Rediscovering FI at Nebraska

The $27 billion Nebraska Investment Council is conducting a deep dive into its fixed income portfolio, inviting up to 25 current and potential external managers to pitch their best ideas. The process begins by wiping any preconceived notions around the allocation’s role in the overall portfolio and justifying its place as if from scratch. It ends two years later with the issuing of mandates.

Previous