Penn PSERS trims leverage, adds fixed income and hones in on fees

From this October $71.9 billion Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System, PSERS, will reduce net leverage, add fixed income allocations, and continue to shave costs off its external investment management fees.

The fund is targeting an annual $130 million reduction in fees by “prudently” lowering the private markets target allocation to 30 per cent (it is currently 36 per cent) and taking the absolute return target allocation down to zero from current levels of 4 per cent of assets.

The trimming and shifting of the portfolio comes after the fund decided to adjust its strategic asset allocation in response to significant ongoing market changes.

Typically the board reassesses the SAA every three years (it last adjusted its SAA in 2021) but may consider adjustments during the interim should material changes occur to the underlying economic and capital market assumptions. In a recent board meeting, members heard how the latest decision reflects the fund’s strength and flexibility to adjust to an ever-evolving market environment.

“PSERS has successfully applied a modest amount of leverage over the years to improve diversification and enhance long-term return expectations,” CIO Ben Cotton said in the meeting. “However material changes to underlying return expectations make it practical to reassess our present targets.”

Rising interest rates have made the cost of leverage higher and by extension, the benefits of such leverage less certain, explained Cotton who oversees 65 internal investment professionals and staff.

Sponsored Content

“Reducing net leverage and making the planned reductions to private markets and absolute return allocations also allows us to simplify the overall asset allocation and reduce risk,” he said. “At the same time, we can preserve the fund’s diversification and liquidity while still maintaining sufficient long-term return expectations to hopefully meet or surpass our 7 per cent annual assumed rate of return.”

The absolute return allocation has targeted returns with a low correlation to public financial markets and strategies have included event driven, relative value, tactical trading and long short equity.

Cutting management fees

PSERS commitment to cut fees follows a concerted strategy to reduce management fees in recent years. According to its annual report, investment expenses decreased by $92.7 million from $618.1 million in FY 2021 to $525.4 million in FY 2022. As a percentage of total benefits and expenses, investment expenses have decreased from a high of 8.2 per cent in FY 2013 to 6.2 per cent in FY 2022.

PSERS is renowned among public pension fund peers for its fee transparency. It requests management fee information from each of its limited partnerships and collective trust fund investments, even if it is not specifically disclosed in the fund’s standard reports or identified in capital call requests.

This information includes base and performance fees obtained from either the fund’s administrator statement, capital account statement, or financial statements and is then used to report all relevant management fees in PSERS’ financial statements.

PSERS – one of America’s oldest pension funds, founded in 1917 although it only had assets under management of $6 billion in the early 80s –  has a 40 per cent long term target asset allocation of equity that includes a 12 per cent allocation to private equity. Public equity consists of small, mid large cap US equity (12 per cent) non US equity (16 per cent). PSERS invests around 33 per cent of the portfolio in fixed income, divided between investment grade, public and private credit and US inflation protection

Real assets comprise 29 per cent of the portfolio and includes public and private real estate and infrastructure, commodities and gold.

Leave a Comment

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

As concerns in private credit mount, Colorado PERA CIO and COO Amy McGarrity says the pension fund isn’t seeing any strains in its growing allocation to the asset class, arguing that long-term investors are shielded from the risks because they can lock up their capital to weather market cycles.

Sort content by

Wiseman’s wise words for investors

Ensuring a portfolio has enough liquidity to rebalance back to the long-term strategic asset allocation is the most critical preparation investors can do ahead of any crisis, according to Mark Wiseman, who said this current environment could be the "opportunity of a generation".

France’s FRR prepares to ramp up equity

The French SWF, FRR, is preparing to invest more in equities and illiquid assets as important reforms extend its time horizon. With the coronavirus crisis delaying the asset allocation decisions the fund is operating in an "intermediate context", slowly shifting out of bonds and into equities.

CIOs ride the corona storm

Even for long term investors who pride themselves on the big picture and horizons stretching far into the future, the unprecedented change of recent weeks is hair-raising. Enough liquidity on hand to take advantage of buying opportunities once they arise and comfortably pay benefits is crucial. We look at the strategies of investors around the world in response to the market conditions.

It’s a drag: why TPA is superior to SAA

A total portfolio approach overcomes the governance, benchmark and inertia drags inherent in strategic asset allocation, and can add returns of 50-100 basis points above SAA, according to global head of investment content at Willis Towers Watson, Roger Urwin.

The rise of the Sovereign Wealth Fund

In the past 20 years the number of SWFs has grown from 20 to more than 100 with their assets estimated to grow by $500 billion a year. So where do they invest and what impact are they having on the market? Sarah Rundell investigates.

Coronavirus: market impacts

The coronavirus has triggered a market correction, bringing the S&P 500 off its all-time high. But as always an analysis of fundamentals, and the relationship between price and value, is essential for allocating capital. So could this be a time to buy?

Previous