From bonds to equities for GPIF

People walking in Shibuya shopping district.

During the two years to the end of December 2016, Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund, the biggest investor in the world, decreased its domestic bonds exposure by 10 per cent, re-allocating the assets to domestic and international equities.

This has been a relatively quick move away from bonds, considering the extent of GPIF’s bond portfolio and the size of the fund. At the end of 2008, the fund had more than 75 per cent of its assets in domestic bonds, with only 6.6 per cent in international equities and 9.4 per cent in domestic equities.

Since December 2014, domestic equities have increased by 4 percentage points, to 23.76 per cent, at the end of December 2016, and international equities have increased by 3.5 percentage points, to 23.16 per cent of the fund.

The fund has $1.3 trillion in assets. It now invests in more than 2120 listed Japanese equities; the largest holding, by dollar investment, is Toyota, at 188,430,900 shares.

Globally, GPIF has holdings in 2596 companies, with the largest including Microsoft, Verizon, Johnson & Johnson, Exxon Mobil, Facebook, GE, Nestle, Wells Fargo, and Procter and Gamble.

As the fund has increased its allocation to equities, it has also become interested in stewardship. This month, it asked all of its external asset managers to disclose the details of their proxy voting records on behalf of GPIF.

Sponsored Content

In a statement, GPIF president Norihiro Takahashi, said: “GPIF believes that disclosure of the details of proxy voting records is very much essential for institutional investors to fulfil own stewardship responsibilities in order to deepen corporate governance reform and move its focus from ‘form’ to ‘substance’ as Japan’s Stewardship Code indicates. GPIF shall continue to enhance the mid- to long-term investment returns for our beneficiaries through improvement of corporate value and fostering sustainable growth of investee companies.”

As previously reported, in 2016, all of the fund’s external asset managers exercised their voting rights.

GPIF uses managers rather than investing directly, because its size makes it too influential. It generally limits a stock owning to 7 per cent. The fund has previously stated that its external managers with poor governance will get a smaller part of the cheque.

Leave a Comment

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

As concerns in private credit mount, Colorado PERA CIO and COO Amy McGarrity says the pension fund isn’t seeing any strains in its growing allocation to the asset class, arguing that long-term investors are shielded from the risks because they can lock up their capital to weather market cycles.

Sort content by

Florida SBA trusts long-term plan

Florida State Board of Administration CIO Ash Williams may modernise real-estate holdings or add Asia exposure, but he sticks to the long-term strategy – especially when tough times loom.

Industriens seeks more in renewables

Fresh off a windfall from green-energy assets in Asia, Denmark’s $26.9 billion Industriens Pension is looking to employ the model in Africa and Latin America, where it has a track record.

Denmark’s PKA goes for wind farms

The top-five Danish pension fund, PKA, has made a bigger push into alternatives than its peers, and a good chunk of that allocation comes from direct investment in offshore and onshore wind farms.

ATP factors in many adjustments

Denmark's $126.9 billion ATP has excelled using allocations to risk factors such as interest rates and inflation, along with frequent tinkering - all based on a robust decision-making process.

AP3 demands more from hedge funds

The Third Swedish National Pension Fund has cut back on hedge fund managers, citing cost, poor returns, and difficulty pinpointing the source of alpha for managers that have done well.

Mercer Pacific’s three key themes

Mercer’s Pacific CIO, Kylie Willment, has made tweaks to better align the portfolio with the potential effects of quantitative tightening, markets late in their cycles, and geopolitical risks.

Previous