What the crisis teaches us about sustainability

Institutional asset owners who have signed the UN Principles of Responsible Investing  were told they must make the effort to help pioneer a sustainable economy, in an address from David Blood, co-founder with Al Gore of Generation Investment Management.

Speaking to a gathering of executives from major Australian pension funds last week, Blood said the financial crisis had showed the perils of shoddy corporate governance, as short-term incentives at many financial institutions contributed to their downfall.

“Short terms and leverage are linked, and are a challenge to sustainability,” he said. “We have to move away from the short-term focus of markets. Asset owners need to not be focused on how X-Y-Z manager did last quarter as this forces fund managers into bad behaviour.”

Blood is senior partner at Generation, a long-only global equity manager whose fundamental
analysis of stocks is guided by sustainability research.

Generation believes the transition from a high-carbon to a low-carbon economy will be a pivotal phase of modern economic history, matching the industrial revolution in scale and the technological revolution in speed.

Sponsored Content

Echoing a Wall Street Journal editorial he wrote in 2008 with Gore, a former US vice-president, he urged institutional
investors to support industries that contributed to a more sustainable mode of capitalism.

He said a three-to-five-year investment horizon on companies was warranted because about 80 per cent of the value of a business lay in their long-term cashflows.

Given this, the pay structures received by company executives should be changed to reflect long-term incentives.

Blood said three commitments should be made in the next 18 months to kick-start a more sustainable economic system. First, a price must be set for carbon. Second, measurements of gross domestic product (GDP) must be changed to include environmental costs and community health. Third, sustainability should become apolitical and be recognised as a frank business topic.

Sustainability needed to “move beyond environmental policy and into economics,” he said. “The reason why there will be a cap-and-trade system is because the business community accepts it. And there needs to be a cost for carbon because investors can make better decisions if they have certainty of it.”

Drawing on the ideas of Robert F. Kennedy, voiced in the 1960s, he said a new measure of GDP was required for a more sustainable model of capitalism because the current one omitted the integrity of natural environments, the health of communities or the quality of education systems.

“The economic wealth and health of societies go much beyond what we’ve been calculating for the last 100 years,” he said.

“If we can move questions of sustainability out of political discourse and into the fundamentals of economics it would be a great move forward.”

The crisis had given society the opportunity to “seize the economic challenge and move from a high-carbon to low-carbon economy” by investing in cleaner technologies and phasing out heavy-emitting processes, he said.

Institutional asset owners should ask their fund managers whether sustainability is factored into their investment decisions, and if so, why and how these considerations are implemented.

“A lot of asset owners don’t ask these questions, and if they do, their answers are often filed away in some sort of compliance place.”

Some investors paid lip service only to the sustainability theme – “because it seems
to be the flavour of the day” – and did not implement it in the portfolios.

“Sustainability is not a – good to have – discussion; it should be integrated into how we think
about businesses and how we run businesses.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous