US providers face tough disclosure laws from July

Service providers in the US will be required to disclose any direct and indirect compensation to plan fiduciaries from July 16, 2011, under new regulations issued by the Department of Labour.

The US Department of Labour’s (DOL) Interim Final Regulation (IFR), issued last July, will enable plan fiduciaries to receive the information they need to make meaningful evaluations of the fees paid by their plans and plan participants.

The IFR requires existing contracts to disclose compensation by the July date, with new or renewed contracts after this date being disclosed before they are entered into and mid-contract changes within 60 days from the date the provider is aware of the change.

The rule comes after concerns were expressed by the DOL, Congress and the retirement industry over the lack of information provided to plan fiduciaries regarding their service providers’ complex compensation structures, making it difficult for these fiduciaries to comply with their fiduciary obligation to determine if fees are reasonable, and if any compensation arrangements involve conflicts of interest.

The rule is part of the DOL’s three-pronged program to address its concern regarding inadequate fee disclosure.

Plan fiduciaries will need to take the following steps to meet the July deadline:

Sponsored Content

1.     Identify all retirement plan service providers

2.     Request in writing the necessary information from each service provider

3.     Determine whether the service providers are “covered service providers”

4.     Follow up any covered service providers who do not provide the necessary information

5.     Evaluate the information received to assess the reasonableness of fees, potential conflicts of interest and other issues that may be revealed

6.     Document in meeting minutes in the second and third quarters of 2011 that the regulation’s requirements have been met

7.     Repeat annually – or at the time of contract changes if sooner

From the July deadline, plan fiduciaries who do not receive the required disclosures will have engaged in a prohibited transaction. However, due to the prohibited transaction exemption, plan fiduciaries will be relieved of any liability if they:

1.     request the necessary information in writing from the provider

2.     notify the DOL if the required information is not provided within 90 days, and

3.     formally evaluate whether the plan should continue to do business with the service provider.

In other DOL news, the department has issued proposed rules requiring additional disclosure on Qualified Default Investment Alternatives (QDIAs).

These proposed rules are aimed at making plan participants more aware of the asset allocations of the various age-based strategies, and how they will change over time; of the specific current age range targeted for the respective target retirement dates and any assumptions made about the participant’s contributions and withdrawals after the target date; and that the participant and their beneficiaries may incur losses and the age-based strategy does not guarantee that there will be sufficient assets for retirement on the target date.

Similar changes have also been proposed for the original QDIA regulations and corresponding requirements have been proposed for the participant fee disclosure rules when individual account plans offer target date or similar investment alternatives.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous