US instos battle for proxy rights on boards

The ongoing saga of US investors’ right to have a say in corporate elections continues with the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) refuting the Business Roundtable’s (BRT) claims that the proxy rule will injure shareholder interests.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a rule in August granting certain long-term investors – shareholders who have held 3 per cent of stock for three  years according to BRT – proxy access at US public companies, but due to the Business Roundtable-Chamber lawsuit, the rule was not put into effect.

According to BRT, proxy access will have a number of unintended consequences including weakened effectiveness of the board of directors and increased costs.

BRT also claims that proxy rules will be hijacked by certain activist shareholders who will use the rules as a tool to advance an agenda that conflicts with the interests of the majority of shareholders.

CII, an association of public, union and corporate pension funds with combined assets in excess of $3 trillion, has refuted BRT’s claims that the rule will injure shareholder interests, saying it warrants scepticism due to BRT’s own description as “an association of chief executive officers of leading US companies”.

“Proxy access will make companies more responsive to their shareowners and more vigilant in their oversight of management,” said CII’s executive director, Ann Yerger.

Sponsored Content

“The basic shareowner right is widely accepted in many countries. US investors deserve this same, fundamental protection.”

Proxy access gives shareholders a voice in corporate board elections by letting them place their nominees for director on the company’s proxy card when they are dissatisfied with the board and want to run their own candidates.

The ongoing saga of proxy rights has brought together 15 pensions funds (including California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the New Jersey Division of Investment and New York City Employees’ Retirement System), with the CII to lodge a “friend of the court” brief to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on January 27 to outline their support of SEC’s proxy rule.

CII has also welcomed the report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, whose findings echoed many of the insights of the July 2009 report of the Investors Working Group (IWG), an independent, non-partisan commission co-sponsored by CII and the CFA Institute Centre for Financial Market Integrity.

The commission concluded the crisis was avoidable and was caused by numerous factors. These included:

  1. widespread failures in financial regulation
  2. dramatic breakdowns in corporate governance
  3. an explosive mix of excessive borrowing and risk by households and Wall Street that put the financial system on a collision course with crisis
  4. key policy makers were ill-prepared for the crisis, and
  5. systematic breaches in accountability and ethics occurred at all levels

“The report is a thorough, painful reminder of the massive failures of oversight that paved the way to the brink of financial Armageddon in 2009,” said CII’s Yerger.

“Gaps in regulation, failures of will on the part of regulators, and complacence on the part of corporate boards contributed to the debacle that cost millions of Americans their jobs and devastated their retirement savings.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Integrating ESG at Norway’s giant SWF

Behind the Strategy Council’s report to the Norwegian Ministry of Finance on responsible investment for the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global.

Defining fiduciary duty

What constitutes fiduciary duty is an ongoing discussion in the pension sector. The UK Law Commission has weighed in on the debate with its own interpretation.     Pension funds mulling the definition and obligations of their fiduciary duty can now refer to a consultation paper from the Law Commission, Fiduciary Duties of Investment Intermediaries.

Investors call for conflict of interest code

As an outsourced provider, fund managers make a series of promises to investors. Anything that tempts the promise to be broken is a conflict of interest, according to chief executive of Carne Group, John Donohoe, whose organisation has conducted a survey of institutional investors’ attitudes to conflicts of interest. In a survey of global allocators

Stock exchanges ‘need nudge on sustainability disclosure’

 A study ranking the world’s stock exchanges against disclosure on sustainability themes ranks the BME Spanish Exchange at the top. But the study’s author managing director of CK Capital, Doug Morrow, says stock exchanges need a nudge by regulators to enforce tougher disclosure standards.   The world’s stock exchanges “need a bit of a nudge”

Dry up: how investors assess water risks

The world is running short of water, but what does that mean for investors? Asset owners in the Netherlands and Norway assess and manage the water-related risks in their portfolios, including the measurement of portfolio companies’ water dependence and water security. The drought hitting South Africa’s North West Province sounds another warning shot around the

Serving itself: why the financial services industry needs reform

What would the financial services industry look like if it was structured to service the non-financial services sector, rather than itself? Economist John Kay, author of the Kay Review into short termism in UK equity markets, aims to find out.   In an ideal world there would be one, maybe two, intermediaries between the saver

Previous