DC plans must look at governance and design

Towers Watson’s Roger Urwin and Gordon Clark from the University of Oxford are finalising their fourth collaboration on global best practice for defined contribution plans. Amanda White spoke with Roger Urwin about the inefficiencies in plan design.

The financial crisis highlighted a lot of inefficiencies in investment markets and the strategies used by pension funds around the globe. The bulk of attention has been directed at asset allocation, asset correlations, liquidity and the role of alternatives. But Roger Urwin. Towers Watson’s head of global investment content – a role that contemplates investment strategy from the clients’ perspective – believes an equal amount of attention should be directed at governance and plan design.

“Pension funds can’t be effective without good plan design, and that’s not settled yet,” he said. “Plan design refers to how the fund works which includes daily dealing and pricing and a lot of those structural points are not settled yet. This is a multi-year type of evolution.”

He says there are many “cracks all over the world” and US public pension funds are one of the more obvious.

Urwin and Professor Gordon Clark, from the University of Oxford, are writing their fourth paper on global best practice for defined contribution plans which looks at governance and plan design.

Sponsored Content

Urwin believes the biggest thing that has to happen is a change in the mindset of pension funds to “investing through retirement not to retirement”.

“When you look at it this way, the key thing about defined contribution plans is they don’t have a cohesive framework between the member and the investment of pension funds.”

He says this lack of engagement between the two creates a problematic investment delivery.

“The individual member doesn’t have the financial sophistication to get an outcome they have trust in. Funds can communicate but the member mightn’t be listening or understanding enough. People are struggling with the super fund proposition, it is [a] counter-intuitive type offer.”

To this end Urwin is an advocate of the “nudge principal” or auto-enrolment, so that members have to opt-out not opt-in.

“This is a multi-year evolution to the culture to enable stronger super fund behaviour and better member behaviour.”

Linked this is better governance in the investment team, which for most funds is a combination of the executive team and investment board.

He questions the quality of the non-executive members of pension fund boards, and quotes Jeremy Cooper, chair of the review into the governance, efficiency, structure and operation of Australia’s superannuation system, who believes pension fund boards should have the same tests as corporate boards.

Urwin, who has been at Towers Watson, or more accurately Watson Wyatt, for the past 20 years, recently stepped down from his position as head of the group’s think tank, the “thinking ahead group”.

He will continue in his role as head of global investment content but will also take up a two-day a week advisory position at MSCI Barra.

Fellow-founding member of the thought leadership group, Tim Hodgson, will take over as head of the group which over the past eight years has explored pension fund issues such as risk budgeting, extreme risks and governance.

While focusing on broad investment research, Hodgson’s papers include investment efficiency, and he is a member of the global investment committee.

“The industry has so many interesting dimensions to it, to be able to operate with several different perspectives is fascinating,” he said. “People who know me know that this is not a winding-down, taking this particular challenge. Risk management is at a fascinating point, it needs to become more sophisticated.”

Urwin has been head of investment content since he handed the global head of investment consulting baton to Carl Hess in July 2008, a position he had held for 13 years.

His position as head of investment content is an “individual” or “free-ranging” role and external to Towers Watson, Urwin is also a member of the CFA board.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous