TMX rejects funds’ bid amid debt concerns

Competition and debt concerns have scuttled an ambitious proposal by a consortium of nine Canadian banks and pension funds to acquire the country’s biggest stock exchange.The group of four Canadian banks and five pension funds made a $3.7 billion counterbid to a proposed merger between the London Stock Exchange and TMX Group – the owners of the Toronto and Montreal Stock exchange.

TMX Group rejected the bid last week amid concerns it could diminish competition and stymie the exchange’s expansion ambitions.

Peter Block, a spokesman for the consortium, which is known as the Maple Acquisition Corporation, said it was disappointed that TMX Group had refused to enter into discussions with them and they were deciding their next move.

The attempt to acquire the exchange came amid concerns that the LSE offer was, in fact, a foreign takeover of the exchange and would move a measure of control over Canada’s financial markets offshore.

The Maple bid was promoted as an “All-Canadian” solution that would create a new group owned 60 per cent by the domestic pension funds and banks.

The pension funds involved were the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, the Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec, Alberta Investment Management Co and the Fonds de solidarite des travailleurs du Quebec.

Sponsored Content

Their involvement would have constituted approximately 35 per cent of the bid, with banks making up the remaining 25 per cent. Existing shareholders would make up the remaining 40 per cent of the proposed new company.

In an effort to address potential conflict of interest no one shareholder in the consortium could own more than 10 per cent of the company.

Block said the Maple consortium believed the structure of the deal would provide for a range of interests and would be further strengthened by securities regulations that require half of the TMX board to be independent directors.

While not prepared to speak directly to why pension funds felt that investment was good for members, Block said the investors felt there was good value in TMX and its future growth potential.

“Each of the Maple investors is doing this because they see an opportunity to create significant value for their respective shareholders or plan beneficiaries by creating a stronger, more integrated and more valuable exchange business,” Block said.

“While the business decision regarding value creation is the paramount focus for each of the investors, we believe our proposal delivers a superior outcome for the TMX and all of its stakeholders.”

In a statement explaining its rejection of the Maple bid, the TMX board said it could raise substantial anti-trust risks with authorities, which may move to block the acquisition of Canada’s largest exchange.

It also raised concerns about the debt needed to finance the cash component of the deal, which they claimed would be a drag on the company’s ambitions to seek expansion opportunities abroad.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Peter Bernstein: Risk Inverse

Peter Bernstein, an economic consultant and respected investment thinker passed away on Friday June 5 in New York. Widely regarded as an intellectual giant in the investment circles for his ability to translate complex mathematical models into practical applications, he founded the Journal of Portfolio Management in 1974 and wrote a number of respected books

…as consultant assessment initiates changes to internal equity team and technology

CalPERS has reached its capacity to internally manage equities portfolios and would need to make changes to technology and staff resources if the internally-managed equities program is expanded, according to the outcome of the annual consultant review of CalPERS’ internal equity team by Wilshire Associates. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Asset class review inspires opportunistic allocation at CalPERS’

CalPERS is considering adopting an “opportunistic” program seeking to profit from substantially undervalued assets across various asset classes and strategies, and will be limited to 3 per cent of the fund’s total market value. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The future of risk management: How independent should risk management be?

Barry Schachter, research associate with the EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre and director, quantitative resources, Moore Capital Management believes the current crisis is a catalyst for change in the conduct of risk management because it has challenged the efficacy of the existing risk management model, but simply imposing regulation is not the change

SWFs struck at financial crisis epicentre: $50b in losses from financials

For their biggest public market investments in the last two years, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) zeroed-in on the most dogged companies in the worst-performing sector: Western financials. These decisions incurred paper losses of $US56.3 billion, accounting for most of their public market losses for the period. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Working hard for the money

Last year large institutional investors in the US, including the State of Massachusetts Pension Fund and CalPERS, dedicated money to senior bank loans. Amanda White examines the outlook for the sector and talks to group head of ING’s senior loan group, Jeff Bakalar, about whether institutional allocations to the sector have been tactical or strategic.

Previous