Tips for DC plan design

As more plan sponsors consider introducing defined contribution plans, Towers Watson encourages the deliberation of plan design, with the ideal scheme encouraging engagement, managing savings rates and investment elections as well as expenses and communication.

Towers Watson says to be successful a defined contribution plan must consider and manage participant engagement, savings rates, investment elections, employer contributions, distribution strategies, plan expense, and communication and education solutions.

Many plan sponsors fall short of their potential to deliver benefits despite apparent success in one of these areas, Towers Watson says.

To better understand what employers are doing to improve the success of DC plans during the past year, it surveyed 334 plan sponsors with combined assets of $386 billion, about 30 per cent of which had assets above $1 billion.

The survey found that many plan sponsors have attempted to better engage participants by designing DC plans that encourage participation, promote higher saving rates and educate employees about their investments.

It found that plan sponsors offering auto-enrolment have a much higher participation rate than those that don’t. Many plan sponsors that offer auto-enrolment also automatically escalate the contribution rate.

Sponsored Content

According to the survey, most plan sponsors are also offering a matching contribution which has been successful in improving participation because employees view it as an enticement.

But despite the positive impact of participation as a result of adopting certain plan design features, Towers Watson says further improvements are still needed if “DC plans are to fulfil their promise as an appropriate vehicle for retirement savings”.

“The practice of allowing plan design to shape and develop employees’ retirement plans has its limitations.

“This is because planning for retirement cannot be uniform for all employees, and employees are not always engaged. To ensure participants are on the road to success, plan sponsors must continue to provide information to help participants gauge how much they’ll need in order to meet their personal needs in retirement. Ensuring that participants have an arsenal of tools to effectively manage their retirement finances should be a near-term priority for employers.”

To access the full survey click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous