The more foreign the market, the more funds-of-funds

The world’s largest institutional investors are increasingly building their own home-region private equity programs, but turning to fund-of-funds for the rest of the world particularly when it comes to Asia, says a Hong Kong-based partner of the first fund-of funds to ever build a product covering that region.

Sally Collier, who recently moved to Hong Kong as a partner of Pantheon Private Equity, said the “mega buy-out” managers who enjoyed a heyday in 2006-7 often had global presences, large capacity and were relatively accessible for researchers.

However, those managers were “no longer flavour of the month”, and demand had now shifted to the less-leveraged players in the middle market.

“The challenge here is that these players might only be raising $1.5 to 2 billion per fund, and they are becoming oversubscribed,” Collier said. “They’re the ones that take serious resources to find and access.”

Many of these “growth-oriented” mid-market private equity general partners were popping up in China and India, Collier said, where there was really no buy-out market to speak of.

Pantheon launched its first Asian private equity fund-of-funds in 1994, and raised its last one in 2006, closing it at $800 million for the seven-year closed-end vehicle.

Sponsored Content

Collier defended the private equity practice of charging fees on committed capital before it was invested, saying that to do otherwise would encourage general partners to make deals no matter what.

“As 2007 progressed our managers slowed down on new investments, and it was that fee structure which allowed them to do that.”

The Pantheon partner did allow that more “fee discussions” were happening in the cost conscious age following the global financial crisis.

She cited the recent example of a Missouri-based institution bargaining a private equity manager into paying 80 per cent of transaction costs for deals made on its behalf, where the historical norm has been a 50:50 split between the general and limited partners.

One response to “The more foreign the market, the more funds-of-funds”

  1. It makes sense that funds of fund become a norm. It lower fees and ease of management will benefit investors.

    ifund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Washington reviews governance, pay and in-house investment

The pay levels, amount of in-house investment activity and governance structure of the $83 billion Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) may be under review following a rigorous debate that included a presentation to the board by KPA Advisory’s Keith Ambachtsheer.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

PRI calls for academics to fill ESG research gaps

Responsible investment research has reached a “tipping point” in its development, says the PRI’s director of strategic development, Rob Lake, and it needs to be more closely aligned to the practical needs of front-line investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Top1000funds.com brings some of the world’s largest investors together in Beijing

More than 70 investors representing more than $3.1 trillion in pension, endowment and sovereign fund capital will converge on Beijing on Sunday for the first Top1000funds Fiduciary Investors Symposium.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

HOOPP splits investment functions as Keohane appointed to top job

The $35.7 billion Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) will split its chief investment officer function in two following the appointment of Jim Keohane to president and chief executive and the retirement of John Crocker.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

No rewards as systemic risk and turbulence ratings soar

The market is reflecting a high state of systemic risk and turbulence, and investors should adjust their allocation to growth assets accordingly, says Lucas Turton, chief investment strategist of Windham Capital Management.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Why institutions trade their reputations for profit

It is a key assumption that financial institutions such as auditing firms and credit ratings agencies will act in an ethical way to protect their reputation because it is, ultimately, the source of their profitability. But groundbreaking work by Harvard University postdoctoral fellow Abigail Brown posits that institutions may actually be incentivised to cyclically “trade

Previous