Tennessee plans asset allocation review

The Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System will conduct an asset allocation and portfolio implementation review, with an equities increase and reorganisation of the fixed income portfolio a likely outcome, as it investigates how to increase the returns of the fund at a strategic level.

The $29 billion fund is looking to increase its equity allocation as part of this review from 55 to 65 per cent of assets, up from its current position of around 50 per cent.

The fund is also looking at eliminating short-duration fixed income, adding non-investment grade fixed income and continuing to increase real estate.

The fund will also search for a general and private equity consultant.

TCRS returned 14.2 per cent for the year, which was an underperformance of 2.1 per cent against its allocation index.

Sponsored Content

Tactical asset allocation was the key drag and subtracted 4 per cent for 2009, with other negative contributing areas including domestic equities and international equities.

Domestic fixed income was the best performer for the fund, up 9 per cent for the year to the end of 2009.

At the March investment committee it was disclosed that the fund is looking to increase returns by a strategic increase of the equity mandate and modifying the domestic and international fixed income mandates.
Other plans include adding to private equity as an asset  class, by way of adding a distressed fund, a mezzanine fund, a small buyout fund, and another venture capital  fund.

The fund  also  has a goal  to  invest  up  to $1  billion  in  real estate over the next  five  years, and  is  also  exploring  the idea of launching a Canadian equity fund.

At the end of 2009 the fund had 2.7 per cent in short-term, 3.3 per cent in real estate, 7.9 per cent in inflation-hedged bonds,3.6 per cent in international fixed income, 33.4 per cent in US fixed income, 14.5 per cent in international equity, and 34.6 per cent in US equity.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous