SWF lions roar in Beijing

Sovereign wealth funds will consider the implications of capital flows and the build-up of foreign exchange assets in Beijing next week at the third annual SWF international forum.

Hosted by the China Investment Corporation, the forum runs for three days from Wednesday, May 11.

The forum will begin with a consideration of the use and application of the Santiago Principles, and then the forum will hear from the first of the IFSWF’s three sub-committees.

This first group is led by Azerbaijan, and consists of Botswana, Chile, China, Kuwait, Norway, and New Zealand.

The next session on risk and investment management will hear from the forum’s second sub-committee led by Kuwait, and consisting of Alaska, Alberta, China, Korea, and New Zealand.

The forum’s case studies will focus on:

Sponsored Content
  • accounting for “fat tails” in portfolio risk management
  • managing currency exposures of financial and non-financial assets, and
  • constructing portfolios for specific macroeconomic environments.

The global investment climate and recipient country relationships will be presented by the third sub-committee led by Australia, and consisting of Abu Dhabi, China, Mexico, Qatar, Russia, and Singapore.

Financial stability and the current state of the global macro economy is the first topic for the second day of the forum, followed by an examination of the impact of the global financial crisis on SWFs and other institutional investors, and its implications for long-term investment strategy.

Other sessions include regulatory reforms, investment regimes and the outlook for institutional investors from both the views of investors and recipients.

The final sessions focus on China:

  • its economy and capital markets
  • as a recipient country: opportunities and challenges, and
  • overseas investment: its role in fostering sustainable global development

The first SWF forum was in Kuwait in April 2009, and the second was in Sydney, Australia, in May last year.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tennessee finally enters private equity game

The $28 billion Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System is a late entrant into private equity with its debut $25 million allocation to the Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund X, occurring at the same time the fund has cut its allocation to short term assets by 5 per cent. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UN fund increases equities exposure

The $37 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund increased its allocation to equities by 4 per cent in the past quarter, at the expense of real estate and bonds, and is now overweight the asset class, as it continues to support active management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS measures liqudity levels

  About half of the $201 billion in assets managed by CalPERS is available to liquidate within 90 days according to a new total fund liquidity assessment to be presented to the investment committee as part of the quarterly risk management update, which also shows the fund to have a total leverage of 19 per

Mapping the risks of bigger government

Bigger appetites for absolute return strategies, new attitudes to risk and governance, and the onset of major regulation – these were the forces for change identified in Watson Wyatt’s 2008 study, Defining Moments. But the social fallout from the financial crisis has sparked another phenomenon that could heavily impact institutional investors, according to Tim Hodgson

LACERS alters allocations to hedge against inflation

The $9.3 billion Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System will tilt its asset allocation to hedge against inflation and will discuss altering its investment policy to explicitly address inflation at each annual asset allocation review. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Massachusetts special commission recommends system changes

A recently completed report by a special commission into the appropriateness of the Massachusetts retirement system contemplated the defined benefit versus defined contribution benefit design, concluding that the existing defined benefit structure was optimal, in part because it put the portfolio management in the hands of professionals. The report entitled, The Special Commission to Study

Previous