SWF lions roar in Beijing

Sovereign wealth funds will consider the implications of capital flows and the build-up of foreign exchange assets in Beijing next week at the third annual SWF international forum.

Hosted by the China Investment Corporation, the forum runs for three days from Wednesday, May 11.

The forum will begin with a consideration of the use and application of the Santiago Principles, and then the forum will hear from the first of the IFSWF’s three sub-committees.

This first group is led by Azerbaijan, and consists of Botswana, Chile, China, Kuwait, Norway, and New Zealand.

The next session on risk and investment management will hear from the forum’s second sub-committee led by Kuwait, and consisting of Alaska, Alberta, China, Korea, and New Zealand.

The forum’s case studies will focus on:

Sponsored Content
  • accounting for “fat tails” in portfolio risk management
  • managing currency exposures of financial and non-financial assets, and
  • constructing portfolios for specific macroeconomic environments.

The global investment climate and recipient country relationships will be presented by the third sub-committee led by Australia, and consisting of Abu Dhabi, China, Mexico, Qatar, Russia, and Singapore.

Financial stability and the current state of the global macro economy is the first topic for the second day of the forum, followed by an examination of the impact of the global financial crisis on SWFs and other institutional investors, and its implications for long-term investment strategy.

Other sessions include regulatory reforms, investment regimes and the outlook for institutional investors from both the views of investors and recipients.

The final sessions focus on China:

  • its economy and capital markets
  • as a recipient country: opportunities and challenges, and
  • overseas investment: its role in fostering sustainable global development

The first SWF forum was in Kuwait in April 2009, and the second was in Sydney, Australia, in May last year.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Systematic rebalancing is not necessarily best way to go

The value of systematic rebalancing of portfolios to bring them back closer to strategic allocations has been questioned in new research by Morgan Stanley.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

If macro is back, who you gonna call?

Is stock picking dead? Fiduciary investors should be starting to wonder, given the cross-sectional volatility of markets over the past three years. But this seems counter-intuitive. Managers have told us we are in a “stock-picker’s paradise”.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CIC expands global reach

The Chinese Investment Corporation will hire a throng of investment professionals to join its nearly 200-member global investment team, following the second meeting of its international advisory council in Shanghai this month. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What now?

This RogersCasey position paper examines the inflation-deflation debate, and the strategic role of real assets in portfolios, concluding there will be higher volatility around long-term average inflation, and that clients should diversify away from US treasuries to protect against sovereign risk. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Canadian penchant for fewer, bigger funds hits Australia

The similarities between Canada and Australia are often remarked upon, and they could be about to extend to pension management if an ambitious plan for a ‘mega-merger’ among Australian state-based funds comes to fruition.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Dutch giant see-saws to recovery

The precarious seesaw that is pension fund asset-liability management is demonstrated in the latest results of the giant Dutch pension fund, ABP, with the fund’s coverage ratio falling, despite positive investment returns, and the fund being only slighly ahead of its recovery schedule. In the first six months of this year the fund’s pension liabilities

Previous