Swedish pension fund collaboration to influence local market

Four of Sweden’s national pension funds (AP1-4) have collaborated with another nine investors to form the Swedish arm of The Sustainable Value Creation, and have already begun surveying the top 100 companies on the NASDAQ OMX Stockholm regarding their governance policies and sustainable value creation.

The Sustainable Value Creation, a group already formed in Norway last year, is aimed at influencing the sustainable development of corporations listed on the local market.

The first action of the investor collaboration has been to survey the largest companies in Sweden and on the Oslo Bors Benchmark Index in Norway, on their policies regarding sustainable value creation, including human rights, labour rights, environment and corruption.

The survey, which has a deadline of October 9, addresses four main areas: the companies’ steering policies and commitments; implementation and adherence; communication and reporting; and board accountability. A publicly available report will be available in early 2010.

The first four buffer funds in the national Swedish pension system have a history of collaboration, having previously formed the Ethical Council to combine resources and votes to increase their influence on foreign companies they invested in. The ethical council coordinates SRI analysis of environmental and ethical compliance of the companies.

Sponsored Content

The Swedish investor group that forms the Sustainable Value Creation has total assets of SEK 3,800 billion ($547 billion) while the group of nine Norwegian investors have a total of NOK 2,500 billion ($425 billion).

One of the key findings of the recent UNPRI annual assessment of signatories was signs of a growing culture of active ownership and collaboration among investors in response to the financial crisis. The Sustainable Value initiative is a good example of this collaboration.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous