Swedish AP funds exclude 10 companies due to ethical breaches

Sweden’s first four buffer funds, with combined assets of SEK 690.6 billion (US$83 billion) have demonstrated a lack of tolerance for companies that continue to breach ethical guidelines despite the funds’ governance efforts to bring about change, excluding 10 companies from their investment universe.

The Ethical Council, which counts AP1-4 as its members, is in ongoing dialogue with a further 13 companies which have
been accused of violating international conventions and principles.

The companies that were excluded include Singapore Technologies Engineering, one of the few listed companies in the world whose manufacturing of anti-personal land mines is documented, and nine other companies on the grounds of reported involvement in development, manufacturing or marketing of cluster bombs and/or their special components.

According to the council’s 2008 annual report, such practices are in violation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which has been signed by Sweden.

The council’s dialogue approach to governance did succeed, however, in bringing about change in three companies, which were all removed from the council’s focus list at the end of 2008.

Sponsored Content

The council said BHP Biliton was removed after vowing to once again permit its new employees to sign collective agreements in accordance with new Australian legislation, while France-based Sodexo was removed after contact with the council prompted the company to immediately formulate and implement a human rights policy following an incident at an immigration removal centre in the UK.

Chevron Corporation’s Nigerian arm was also removed following successful dialogue around improvements on human rights.

L-3 Communications was removed from the focus list due to exclusion from the investment universe after the company was reported for marketing several special components in violation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

The Ethical Council was set up in 2006, and at the beginning of 2007, following a screening of the funds’ combined holdings; the council selected 12 companies to work with actively.

“Dialogue is the basis for our work, and we prefer not to exclude a company before we have done everything in our power to bring about a change,” said Carl Rosen, outgoing chairman of the council who has been replaced in 2009 by Christina Kusoffsky Hilles. “But sometimes we are forced to recommend exclusion.”

The companies that have been excluded by all funds are: Alliant Techsystems Inc, GenCorp, General Dynamics Corp, Hanwha Corp, L-3 Communications Hlds, Lockheed Martin Corp, Poongsan Cor (and Poongsan Holdings Corp), Raytheon Company, Singapore Technologies Engineering and Textron Inc.

Those with whom dialogue continues include: AES Corporation, Bridgestone Corporation, Chevron Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold Inc, Grupo Ferrovial S.A, PetroChina Company Limited, Rio Tinto Limited, Thales SA, Toyota Motor Corporation, Vedanta Resources Plc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and
Yahoo! Inc.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CalPERS: a new framework of economy

CalPERS has adopted 10 preliminary investment principles following a board offsite in July, but a number of topics, including the role of active management, are still under debate ahead of the September board meeting that is the deadline for the principles’ adoption. The $266-billion Californian fund began the process for establishing investment principles in January

Social networks in the investment web

Reels of financial data and analysis coupled with the occasional piece of market gossip or personal hunch are the time-honoured tools investors rely on in building an active portfolio. More recently, an element of sustainability or corporate governance analysis has tried to muscle into the process. Soon there will be another revolutionary option complementing financial

Eijffinger’s decade of financial repression

Financial repression will define the economic landscape for at least another decade, according to professor of financial economics at Tilburg University, Sylvester Eijffinger, which has serious implications for institutional investors. Eijffinger, who also is also a visiting professor at Harvard, sits on the monetary experts panel of the European Union and is an adviser to

Is reviving Europe a suspended apparition?

Getting Europe’s swelling institutional capital to support long-term projects that could benefit its uninspired economies was an idea that sent heads nodding around the continent as it suffered the brunt of the financial crisis. Get pension, insurance and foundation money into where it is most needed with the attraction of reliable long-term cash flows and

Let’s talk about underfunding

Even using the assets of the pension plan was not enough of a leg-up to save the city of Detroit from bankruptcy. As the last words in the song Put your hands up for Detroit by Fedde Le Grand say, it is system shutdown. The fiscal demise of this city may be a lesson for

Johnson urges pension simplicity

There is a David-and-Goliath feeling to the battle Michael Johnson, a research fellow at the London-based think tank the Centre for Policy Studies, is waging against the pension industry. His research, which lays out the case for radically simplifying all aspects of the United Kingdom’s pension sector, has earned him a reputation as a maverick.

Previous