That market’s got style: investing through cycles

Style investing remains a powerful tool in periods of market volatility and, in particular, style analysis reminds investors to be aware of the distinction between overall market risk and stock specific risk. Amanda White spoke with director of Style Research, Robert Schwob.

As the provider of global equity research and portfolio analysis software, the executives of Style Research, spend their days analysing market movements, subsequent portfolio moves and whether managers are being true to
their word. The company provides a range of style, risk and performance analysis facilities and according to director of Style Research, Robert Schwob, there are now a number of interesting dynamics in the market.

While a few months ago Schwob says the market would have leant itself to more passive management, now the opportunity is ripe for good stock selection.

“The market seems to have opened up to active management in the last couple of months, and stock selection seems quite attractive now,” he says. “This highlights the distinction between overall market risk and stock specific risk.”

“One of the interesting features of the market right now, is the disparity of valuations among similar stocks, and usually when that happens the opportunity is fantastic,” he says. “The market is now throwing up some interesting dynamics.”

Sponsored Content

Style investing has been part of the investing world since Graham and Dodd first introduced value in the 1930s, followed quickly by the introduction of growth by T Rowe Price, and Schwob believes the categorisation of global portfolios according to style remains a legitimate methodology.

Further, he believes looking at style reveals interesting dynamics about investor motivation, fear, greed, trends and risk.

According to Style Research’s definition of style, first published in the Journal of Asset Management in 2000, style exists within markets when there are: “simply identifiable segments of the market with distinguishable patterns of return, where the factors used to identify the various market segments reveal significant elements of security returns, where the patterns of returns are likely to be persistent or systematic and forecastable over a usable investment term, and where these characteristics are not due to the influence of other identifiable characteristics, such as industrial sector influences”.

Founder of Style Research, Schwob is also a director of INQUIRE UK and on the editorial board of the Journal of Asset Management, and he says by recognising that in equity markets there are generally only a few key factor criteria that are systematically related to securities, portfolio, and investment manager performance, they can be analysed to anticipate important factor return trends, trend shifts and their influences on performance.

However he warns that while the intuition may be very similar, basic styles frequently differ considerably from market to market, both in the detail of their factor components as well as in the co-ordination and timing of their cycles.

“While style is an extremely useful concept and a practical analytical tool in global markets, there are notable differences across markets and analysis must remain culturally sensitive to local market characteristics.”

Style Analysis sponsors research at various universities and a recent Cambridge study showed that there are specific cycles that dictate whether value or growth is in ascendancy: interest rate cycle, economic or profit cycle, and the
equity market cycle.

“When interest rates are high, companies with real assets will do well. The market cycle and economic cycle are fairly straight forward, at the top of the economic cycle when there is exuberance the overpromoted growth companies will pull back. Value does well when the equity market begins to turn positive.”

“Now are we at that time? Growth did better than value as we tipped into the recession where you’d rather have  companies with a strong projection of growth. That’s fine until you get to the top of the rollercoaster, when you are in the recession and you hit a pothole, you don’t know how far to go down.”

But regardless of the position in the cycle, Schwob says it is important to see how managers behave through the entire cycle.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous