Sovereign debt’s grave new world

Bonds have been the saviour for institutional investors in the global recovery, but a new bout of risk-aversion induced by concerns about sovereign risk threatens the stability of the traditionally defensive assets.

Bond certificate

Risk aversion has become a clear trend in recent weeks and caused US 10-year Treasury Bills to close at the end of June with a yield of 2.93 per cent – the lowest rate in more than a year – while two-year bonds closed at 0.6 per cent, their lowest yield in history, even those following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, notes Kapstream, a fixed-income boutique, in a recent research note.

“Similar to what happened during the crisis, market psychology is currently driven by the adage: return of capital is more important than return on capital,” Kapstream writes.

This flight from risk is broadly being driven by worries about sovereign risk, the impact of austerity measures and funding stress of many European banks. And while these measures aim to remedy Europe’s fiscal problems, they are expected to destroy growth in the process.

Investors are weary of the bad news. “Market fatigue seems to have set in. While cutting rates to zero combined with quantitative and fiscal easing created a short-term resolution, the market looks to be poised for another setback unless additional stimulus is added,” the manager writes.

Sponsored Content

But Kapstream believes the likelihood of a double-dip recession is unlikely unless a major catalyst – a sovereign default or another large drop in US housing – rocks the financial world. However the risks affecting markets now are the most severe since the recovery began.

And they permeate the traditional safe harbour of institutional portfolios. Kapstream believes the current upside in holding G7 government debt is limited. The rally in these assets in the past few months has been driven largely by fear, and bond yields now fully reflect a slowdown in economic growth over the next year.

Referring to a GMO history of 10-year Treasury Bill performance from 1971 to 2010, the manager pointed out that bonds with a nominal return of 2.8 per cent, which is less than than today’s yield, delivered a real return barely above zero.

PIMCO, the world’s largest bond manager, believes that policy risk has emerged as one of the headline risk factors in the ‘new normal’ environment that the recovery has brought us into. Policy risk impacts markets when the hand of government directly influences financial markets. The debt bailout package for Greece, at about $927 billion, was the latest major fiscal stimulus handed down by Western governments since the financial crisis broke in September 2008.

In the ‘new normal’, characterised by the continuing strong economic growth in major emerging economies and a slowdown in the developed world, the US will still be a dynamic economy and the dollar will remain the world’s reserve currency, PIMCO notes. But it is battling structural problems such as high debt in government and households, and political polarisation.

Kapstream points out that 46 of the 50 states are likely to experience budget shortfalls amounting to $112 billion for the current financial year. By far, California is in the worst shape: it bears an unemployment rate exceeding 12 per cent and its $19 billion budget deficit is more than those of Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Hungary and Romania combined, the manager writes.

The US will also remain the pre-eminent ‘safe haven’ for bond investors, and for this reason PIMCO recommends that investors direct their interest rate exposures toward the US, and seek diversification in countries with sound fiscal conditions, notably Germany, Canada and Brazil, and the sovereign debt of well-performing emerging markets such as Mexico, Korea and Russia, which have low levels of debt relative to the size of their economies.

It also recommends a modest currency exposure to countries with solid fiscal conditions and banking systems, such as Australia, Brazil and Canada.

It’s becoming clear that emerging market debt will play a bigger role in defensive portfolios in the years ahead.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

How to avoid being the butt of a carbon price joke

Executive director of the Asset Owners Disclosure Project and business director of the Climate Institute, Julian Poulter, aruges the progress of carbon legislation in Australia is a wake-up call to asset owners around the globe. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What price is right for a low carbon future

Australia’s lower house of Parliament passed a carbon tax yesterday. It prices carbon at $23 a ton. India’s carbon tax is 80 rupees (about $1) a ton. So what is the appropriate price of carbon? According to Robert Litterman in his Financial Analysts Journal editorial, it is a complex equation that should reflect fundamental uncertainty

Déjà vu as Wilshire warns CalPERS of ARS portfolio risks

CalPERS’ absolute return strategies program is over-reliant on quantitative tools, inadequately staffed and may be overweight in certain strategies and risks, according to Wilshire’s annual review of the portfolio.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investors have more than just voting in their engagement armoury, study finds

Institutional investors are using just a fraction of the “weapons” they have at their disposal when they engage with companies, and need to use the entire proxy proposal process better, Rob Bauer told attendees at a recent PRI conference.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

DiNapoli defends DB schemes

New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, has defended public defined benefit schemes, saying that they are not a drag on state government finances, are sustainable and form a vital part of the US economy.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Funds seek the elixir of scale

The investment firepower and cost savings promised by economies of scale have enraptured the Australian superannuation industry. This has instilled in some funds an urge to merge in order to enjoy the benefits of being large. However some investment chiefs believe that bigger size brings a new set of problems that can undermine performance.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous