DNB approves Shell recovery plan

The 10.6 billion ($15 billion) Shell Pension Fund’s recovery plan has been approved by De Nederlandsche Bank and includes a provision to increase employer contributions to 32 per cent, up from 5 per cent last year, on the back of a whopping -43.3 per cent return for 2008.

The funding ratio has plummeted to 80 per cent, after reaching about 180 per cent in 2007. The plan sets out how the pension fund expects to restore the funding ratio within three years to the statutory minimum level of 105 per cent and within 15 years to 127 per cent.

The recovery measures necessitated higher pension contributions. The employer’s contribution gradually increased
from 5 per cent, to 23.6 per cent and then 32.1 per cent as of July this year. In the second quarter of this year the employer also made an additional payment of 2billion ($2.96 billion).

If the funding ratio is lower than 105 per cent the employer will make further additional payments in up to 10 installments.

The fund is managed by the Shell Asset Management Company, which executes an active investment policy which allows for the ability to deviate from the strategic asset allocation.

In the fourth quarter of 2008 the fund made a temporary adjustment of its investment policy to reduce risk. Its new asset allocation for 2009-2011 is 45 per cent to listed equities, 20 per cent to alternatives, 35 per cent to fixed income, 0 per cent to cash.

Sponsored Content

The strategic asset allocation is set triennially, and for 2008 to 2010 its allocation was set at 55-63 per cent to listed equities, 7-15 per cent in alternative investments, 30 per cent to fixed income investments, 0 per cent to cash, 8 per cent to hedge funds, -8 per cent to loans concerning hedge funds.

The actively managed equities portfolio suffered heavy losses (-56.7 per cent) due mainly to the emphasis on small cap shares. Fixed income also suffered losses because of the exposure to government bonds in emerging markets.

An evaluation of its own performance by the board has resulted in a number of changes. The organisation has been extended and set up differently and processes and systems are being improved. It was revealed risk management must be improved.

Leave a Comment

More from this fund

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous