Schapiro considers action on pay to play

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is currently considering pay-to-play activities and will report back on any proposed action in the next few weeks, according to its chairman Mary Schapiro, speaking via video at the annual International Corporate Governance Network conference this week.

Schapiro said pay-to-play activities distorted the process by which investment advisers were selected and affected public pension plans’ fees and investments, and has asked staff to revist the SEC’s 1999 proposals for dealing with the issue.

Pay-to-play schemes have been banned by a number of large US public pension schemes in recent months, including New York and California, with some industry observers saying regulation of the practice has been undertaken by the market, instead of the authorities.

This is one of a number of key overhauls Schapiro is undertaking as part of her aim to return the SEC to its investor advocacy roots.

Other areas of focus on which the SEC is calling for comments include strengthening the regulatory regime around money market funds, including the requirement that these funds be stress tested and have monthly reporting; and the rule on facilitating shareholder director nominations.

Sponsored Content

“I am striving to bring an investor focus back to the SEC,” she said. “We need to be constantly improving ourselves not just in a crisis. We need to be alert to the risks of dynamic innovation in how financial products are developed and sold.”

In addition the SEC’s new 18-member investor advisory panel will be considering the Principles for Responsible Investment and enviornmental, social and governance disclosure in SEC-registered companies at its first meeting later this month.

The SEC oversees 35,000 registrants and has a staff of 3600.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous