Record losses for UK DB plans underscored by reliance on markets…

Five consecutive days leading into March were the most volatile on record for UK final salary pension schemes since accounting standards were changed in 2001, reflecting the risks associated with funding dependence on investment markets.

Aon Consulting, which measured the knock-on effect of volatile markets as measured by company accounts, found the combined deficits for the UK’s 200 largest defined benefit (DB) schemes between 26 February and 4 March, as calculated by the Aon200, were: £38 billion; £41 billion; £68 billion; £73 billion and £56 billion.

Marcus Hurd, head of corporate solutions at Aon Consulting in London, said volatile times such as these highlighted the need for every company to carefully balance its own risk appetite and cash management situation to find its optimal solution.

“Pension scheme deficits can only be funded by two sources – investment returns or contributions,” he said.

“Every company faces a difficult task in balancing the two approaches, because increased reliance on investment returns also often comes with increased risk.”

Hurd said company directors were facing a roulette wheel of pension scheme deficits.

Sponsored Content

“The levels of changes we are seeing are frightening even the hardiest finance director. A cool head and knowledge of all the options available are essential in these difficult times,” he said.

“We are seeing swings of unprecedented proportions at the current time. With one half of companies about to formally report their position at March 31, this is a real concern.”

However he said while pension scheme losses are obviously concerning, unless there is a risk the sponsoring employer goes into solvency it is worth remembering that pension schemes are long-term investors and have long periods of time to recover.

“It is only short term measurements, such as company accounts, that reflect the losses,” he said. “Sensible long-term financial planning and risk management should be high on the agenda.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous