PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks.

The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and part of a consultation with signatories regarding a 10-year blueprint for making responsible investment mainstream.

Managing director of PRI, Fiona Reynolds, says this will include policy and behavioural issues affecting the financial system.

She said this would include the role of asset owners in addressing policy issues, the role of stock exchanges, and the impact of high-frequency trading, short-term payment incentives and short-term mandates.

The PRI will conduct a consultation with signatories regarding the development of a seventh principle in the middle of next year.

The six principles were developed 10 years ago and are focused on implementation and the effect of ESG on portfolio holdings. But the PRI’s mission is focused on an economically efficient and sustainable global financial system, so the evolution of the principles to include systemic risks is a natural step.

Sponsored Content

“We believe that an economically efficient, sustainable global financial system is a necessity for long-term value creation. Such a system will reward long-term, responsible investment and benefit the environment and society as a whole,” the PRI mission says.

PRI has engaged an independent Dutch consulting firm to measure the PRI’s impact over the past 10 years and will launch this document at its tenth birthday celebrations in New York next April.

Separately it will produce a blueprint outlining the areas of focus for PRI in the next decade in making responsible investment mainstream. This will include interviews with signatories about systemic risks.

“We are recognising that as universal owners, asset owners are in the whole market so they have to care,” Reynolds says. “We’re calling this PRI 2.0 internally, and focusing on what we need to do to get to the next level.”

Speaking at conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com’s Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Chicago Booth School of Business in October, Martin Skancke, chair of the PRI Advisory Council, called on investors to step up to the conversation about the systemic risks such as carbon risk and long-term stability of markets.

“The asset owner perspective is missing. Asset owners are not necessarily in the market daily, they are removed from the market, but are paying the costs of an inefficient market,” he said.

“You should be asking ‘What does a good trading place look like for me? Who should be allowed to trade? How should information regarding trades be made available and to whom?’ These are really important questions and asset owners are absent from the conversation.”

Skancke said some of the perceived conflicts between ESG and fiduciary duty come from a misconception.

“For me it’s about the stability and usefulness of the financial system itself,” he said.

“It is seen as responsible investment limiting the investment universe. All investors exclude assets for various reasons; for example, you don’t believe in the business model, don’t like the market, the investment doesn’t meet cashflow requirements. It’s just another constraint.

“For me it’s about widening your information set, not limiting the investment universe. How do you organise the information set and take a broader view of the risks you’re taking?”

ESG as a fiduciary duty is about raising the standard of corporate behaviour generally, he said.

 

The six principles are:

Principle 1: we will incorporate ESG issues into investment analysis and decision-making processes

Principle 2: We will be active owners and incorporate ESG issues into our ownership policies and practices

Principle 3: We will seek appropriate disclosure on ESG issues by the entities in which we invest

Principle 4: We will promote acceptance and implementation of the Principles within the investment industry

Principle 5: We will work together to enhance our effectiveness in implementing the Principles

Principle 6: We will each report on our activities and progress towards implementing the Principles

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Holland’s hybrid: defined ambition

Jan Tamerus, actuary director at PGGM, was instrumental in developing the new Dutch pension defined-ambition structure. Back in 2006, he was involved in looking at the sustainability of the defined benefit system and in concluding it was not in fact sustainable, the idea of defined ambition evolved. One of the key reasons for not going

Previous