Predicting equity returns with rising rates

The impact of higher rates on equity returns is a concern for investors and to some extent an unknown. But by applying the concept a threshold correlation, as done with bond portfolios with a duration targeting framework, it is possible to better understand the complex interactions between equity returns and interest rate movements.

The latest portfolio strategy research paper by Morgan Stanley Research’s Martin Leibowitz and Anthony Bova, shows that while theoretical, uses duration targeting for equities and the concept of a threshold correlation to provide some guidance in assessing the impact of rising rates on long-term equity returns.

It finds there is a threshold correlation between equities and interest rates that can be applied to maintain an initial expected require return across a range of interest rate paths.

For a 10-year horizon the threshold correlation was found to be -0.3, so a correlation greater than that leads to improved 10-year returns for positive drift rates and to a deteriorating 10puyear returns for negative rate drifts.

Over shorter horizons, such as five years, the threshold correlation is -0.15

The study focuses on two simulations: rate-driven increases in expected equity return; and realised return drags from adverse equity/rate correlations. It uses a simulation approach with two interconnected random walks for interest rates and equity returns.

Sponsored Content

 

The detailed paper Portfolio Strategy: A Theoretical Model of Equity / Bond Correlation under Rising Rates, can be accessed in the Morgan Stanley Investment Management Journal InvMgtJournal_2014v4i1

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous