Pensions embrace short-term caution

Large pension funds around the globe are being cautious in current markets and are looking to “batten down the hatches”, a panel of investors told delegates at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles last week.

Vicki Fuller, chief investment officer of the $209 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund, said the fund is mostly an equity investor, with more than 50 per cent in that asset class. It also has about 30 per cent in alternatives and the rest in fixed income.

“We continue to invest because we have to but we try not to be too cute,” Fuller said. “We are too large to move to 50/50 fixed income and equities, but if I could, maybe I would. Now we look to batten down the hatches and look for information that will inform the next downturn.”

Similarly, the $222 billion California State Teachers’ Retirement System is staying close to its investment targets; for example, its global equities target is 54 per cent and it is allocating 53.7 per cent, and in fixed income it has invested 12.37 per cent against its 13 per cent target.

“We think the world looks like goldilocks – not too hot and not too cold,” CalSTRS CIO Chris Ailman said. “Last week, all the investment staff met, and we didn’t see anything too cheap, so are staying close to our investment targets; if anything, taking a bit of risk off. We are long term and we’re looking out 30 years. Ours is a very mature pension fund, and [has] negative cash flow, so we can afford [to have] only about one-third of the portfolio in unlisted, and we are finding they are priced to perfection.”

Fuller and Ailman spoke at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles last week.

Sponsored Content

They were joined on a panel titled “Long-term value in a short-term world” by Nick Moakes, CIO of the $33 billion Wellcome Trust.

The trust, which spends $1 billion each year funding medical research, doesn’t have a long tail of liabilities, so doesn’t have to own fixed income, but it did recently issue a 100-year bond.

“Our view is everything in fixed income is overpriced,” Moakes told conference attendees. “We’re more focused on cash flows, rather than the price that the market is putting on that.”

Wellcome, like CalSTRS and New York Common, is a true long-term investor and is focusing on companies that have sustainable business models.

“We don’t define it as ESG but as a [company’s] licence to operate,” Moakes said. “We look at how they treat suppliers, customers and employees.”

In a tribute to this process, the fund hasn’t sold a portfolio company for five years.

“We have had zero portfolio turnover,” Moakes said.

He and Ailman are both passionate about influencing public companies to invest more sustainably, and focus more on the long term.

“I am a paid up member of the club to abandon quarterly earnings,” Moakes said. “Some companies, for example Unilever, are doing it, and it’s had zero impact on their share price.”

Similarly, Ailman is working with other investors to steer companies towards information that long-term investors need and want.

“What I want is more forward-looking information,” Ailman said. “It’s not about 90 days, anything in life that is worthwhile is longer than 90 days. I need to invest members’ money for 60 years. I need a long-term perspective and I need companies we invest in to think longer term, almost multi-generational. You’re a bank today, will you be a bank in the future? We will continue to hold your stock, so do us a favour and think long term.”

All of the investors on the panel agreed that divestment was not a strategy they thought worked. Instead, they preferred to hold a seat at the table to change behaviour.

“For many of us that are large, we don’t have a concentrated portfolio and hold the markets as a unit,” Ailman explained. “Divestment has not brought about change. Now we are asking universities to start researching what has brought about change.”

New York Common’s Fuller said engagement is the catalyst.

“There are a whole host of issues on the ‘social’ side; [for example] around guns or prisons,” she said. “If we divest from, say, guns, what do you do about the stores that sell the guns? We don’t change the equation at all. Engagement is key.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

Previous