Overcoming UNPRI implementation hurdles

With some government-committed funding, the Responsible Investment Academy, has the flexibility to achieve its aim of being the first global academic-training centre to teach pension funds and their service providers how to formally incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in their investment assessments. Amanda White spoke to chair of the academy’s advisory council, Steve Gibbs.

About 180 global institutional investors, and more than 300 hundred of their service providers, agree with the United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI) enough to sign up to them. And yet, still most internal fund investment staff and funds management  analysts struggle with how to practically implement these principles into their analysis of investments.

Principles 1 and 4 go some way to instructing how to do this, with guidance such as “ask investment service providers to integrate ESG factors into evolving research and analysis” or “revisit relationships with service providers that fail to meet ESG expectations”.

But this doesn’t give much instruction on how to actually implement ESG considerations into stock picking analysis, quantitative modelling or risk management from an analysts perspective, be they an external provider or internal funds manager.

This is the logic behind the idea by Louise O’Hallaran, executive director of the Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA), to set up a Responsible Investment Academy.

Sponsored Content

Using some face-to-face technology, and embracing web technology, the Academy will offer a series of progressive, multi-media training courses, starting with professional development seminars that will be rolled out before the end of this year, spurred by the assistance of the Australian Government’s A$2.5 million ($2 million) financial commitment over three years.

With a global reach, the Academy will be managed by the RIAA and governed by an Australian and international advisory council, chaired by Steve Gibbs, who was also a representative on the UNPRI steering committee and global investor group that set up the principles.

According to Gibbs, while there has been great interest in the principles, there is a significant gap in how to implement them.

The aim is a formal academic-level training program available for investment professionals to develop skills in this area, will help in the implementation and development of the principles.

Indeed the PRI says: “for institutional investors to make these Principles work, they will need to encourage a change in the way that their agents incorporate ESG issues into their processes”.

According to Gibbs the Academy will provide responsible investment research, policy and innovation and in particular provide investment professionals with a structured education and training program on key responsible investment risks, opportunities and concepts.

Funds manager analysts and brokers will be the main focus of the program, but it will extend to business development managers, as well as pension fund staff and trustees.

“I think even if internal fund staff and trustees knew the questions to ask, they wouldn’t know if they were getting the right answer,” Gibbs says.

Since the Australian Government’s commitment to the academy, Gibbs and his advisory council, made up of industry and investor representatives, have been developing the curriculum and deciding on the best delivery mechanisms.

While the academy has decided on an online delivery provider, the decision whether to partner with a tertiary education facility has not yet been made.

“On one hand it would be better not to, as we are looking at developing very practical courses,” he says.

It is expected that professional development seminars will be held before the end of the year, but Gibbs says it is a two-year project to fully develop the course.

Gordon Noble, principal at Responsible Investment Consulting, is the project officer.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous