Ohio uncertain on alternatives consultant

The $72 billion Ohio Public Employees Retirement System is looking for an investment consultant to advise on its $10 billion alternatives program, and is considering whether to hire separate consultants for each asset class or one consultant to advise on the entire program.

The fund, which has $60 billion in the defined benefit fund and the remainder in health care, has about $3 billion in private equity, $5 billion in real estate, $665 million in hedge funds, $800 million in REITs, and $98 million in commodities.

The RFP document outlines that the OPERS board wants to consider whether to consolidate all strategic alternatives investment consultant relations with one firm or to retain its existing arrangement of separate mandates – for private equity, real estate, and for the first time, hedge funds.

“OPERS understands that consolidating services with fewer providers usually provides cost savings. Nonetheless, OPERS also understands that many plans retain specialist expertise through separate consultant mandates, as OPERS is currently structured. Consulting firms have developed different business models. In some cases, those models are in transition,” the document says.

With this in mind, and in particular the consideration of the value proposition of using separate services for alternatives asset classes, the fund is asking for proposal on two distinct levels: either for individual asset classes; or as strategic alternatives consultant, combining all three.

Services for alternatives would include market overview and strategy for each asset type as well as policy advice, program guidelines, sector allocations, and investment pacing models but would not include manager-level selection or advice.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous