NZ Super better than average on UN PRI

The US$10 billion sovereign fund New Zealand Superannuation Fund (NZSF) has, in its typically transparent fashion, published a UN assessment of its adherence to the UN Principles for Responsible Investment.

The assessment revealed the NZSF made progress on adherence to all six principles between 2007 and 2008, and is now in the top quartile for Principles 2 and 3 and in the top half of the 300-plus signatories to UNPRI for all the others.

“It is important to remember we are a new fund and that responsible investment is also an evolving area,” said Ann-Maree O’Connor, head of responsible investment at the NZSF trustee company, the Guardians.

“We have made significant progress in a short period. Looking ahead, given that we employ specialist investment managers to carry out our investment strategies, we are assessing how we can better incorporate responsible investment issues into their decision making.  This is a challenge for most funds of our size and diversification.”

To that end, the NZSF also announced the appointment of a specialist ESG analyst.

Sponsored Content

Meanwhile in the region, one of Australia’s largest superannuation funds, the US$15.6b UniSuper, recently began voting proxies on one-third of the shares it owns in Asian markets, covering more than 400 companies.

David St John, chief investment officer of UniSuper, said the fund, which has approximately AUD$1 billion invested in the region, decided to expand its proxy voting policy after observing improvements in voting services in Asia.

Corporate governance practices in Asia were “still maturing” and the integrity of proxy voting processes varied, St John said, but the infrastructure required to vote shares with more confidence had been built.

The fund appointed British proxy voting services company Pension Investment Research Consultants to advise it on shareholder votes in the region.

St John expected UniSuper’s move to improve the long-term performance of its investments and “encourage greater participation from other global investors” during shareholder votes in Asia.

UniSuper is a signatory to the UN PRI, which advocates that funds diligently vote proxies.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

How to avoid being the butt of a carbon price joke

Executive director of the Asset Owners Disclosure Project and business director of the Climate Institute, Julian Poulter, aruges the progress of carbon legislation in Australia is a wake-up call to asset owners around the globe. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What price is right for a low carbon future

Australia’s lower house of Parliament passed a carbon tax yesterday. It prices carbon at $23 a ton. India’s carbon tax is 80 rupees (about $1) a ton. So what is the appropriate price of carbon? According to Robert Litterman in his Financial Analysts Journal editorial, it is a complex equation that should reflect fundamental uncertainty

Déjà vu as Wilshire warns CalPERS of ARS portfolio risks

CalPERS’ absolute return strategies program is over-reliant on quantitative tools, inadequately staffed and may be overweight in certain strategies and risks, according to Wilshire’s annual review of the portfolio.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investors have more than just voting in their engagement armoury, study finds

Institutional investors are using just a fraction of the “weapons” they have at their disposal when they engage with companies, and need to use the entire proxy proposal process better, Rob Bauer told attendees at a recent PRI conference.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

DiNapoli defends DB schemes

New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, has defended public defined benefit schemes, saying that they are not a drag on state government finances, are sustainable and form a vital part of the US economy.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Funds seek the elixir of scale

The investment firepower and cost savings promised by economies of scale have enraptured the Australian superannuation industry. This has instilled in some funds an urge to merge in order to enjoy the benefits of being large. However some investment chiefs believe that bigger size brings a new set of problems that can undermine performance.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous