NZ Super better than average on UN PRI

The US$10 billion sovereign fund New Zealand Superannuation Fund (NZSF) has, in its typically transparent fashion, published a UN assessment of its adherence to the UN Principles for Responsible Investment.

The assessment revealed the NZSF made progress on adherence to all six principles between 2007 and 2008, and is now in the top quartile for Principles 2 and 3 and in the top half of the 300-plus signatories to UNPRI for all the others.

“It is important to remember we are a new fund and that responsible investment is also an evolving area,” said Ann-Maree O’Connor, head of responsible investment at the NZSF trustee company, the Guardians.

“We have made significant progress in a short period. Looking ahead, given that we employ specialist investment managers to carry out our investment strategies, we are assessing how we can better incorporate responsible investment issues into their decision making.  This is a challenge for most funds of our size and diversification.”

To that end, the NZSF also announced the appointment of a specialist ESG analyst.

Sponsored Content

Meanwhile in the region, one of Australia’s largest superannuation funds, the US$15.6b UniSuper, recently began voting proxies on one-third of the shares it owns in Asian markets, covering more than 400 companies.

David St John, chief investment officer of UniSuper, said the fund, which has approximately AUD$1 billion invested in the region, decided to expand its proxy voting policy after observing improvements in voting services in Asia.

Corporate governance practices in Asia were “still maturing” and the integrity of proxy voting processes varied, St John said, but the infrastructure required to vote shares with more confidence had been built.

The fund appointed British proxy voting services company Pension Investment Research Consultants to advise it on shareholder votes in the region.

St John expected UniSuper’s move to improve the long-term performance of its investments and “encourage greater participation from other global investors” during shareholder votes in Asia.

UniSuper is a signatory to the UN PRI, which advocates that funds diligently vote proxies.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous