NZ quake fund skates on very thin reserves

New Zealand’s earthquake disaster relief fund could be completely drained following the fatal 6.3 quake that flattened large swathes of central Christchurch on February 22.

The Earthquake Commission (EQC) was already releasing about NZ$1.5 billion ($1.1 billion) of the $4.4 billion disaster fund to pay for claims generated by the 7.1 quake that caused widespread destruction in Christchurch last September.

The latest New Zealand government accounts to the end of January this year show the EQC had budgeted for insurance claims amounting to just over $1.78 billion from the September event.

While the fund itself must meet the first $1.1 billion in claims it had reinsurance in place up to a further $1.85 billion.

The EQC covers residential homeowners up to a value of $74,000 per claim. Owners who had been paid out after the September quake would be able to claim again if their homes sustained fresh damage following the latest catastrophe.

According to latest government estimates, about 10,000 Christchurch homes would have to be demolished while a further 100,000 required some level of repair as a result of the February earthquake.

Sponsored Content

If the latest round of claims exceeded $2.95 billion ($1.1 billion from the fund plus $1.85 billion from reinsurers), the EQC would have to dip into its remaining capital, which would amount to about $2.22 billion of New Zealand fixed-interest investments.

Last year Phil Jacques, EQC chief financial officer, told Top1000Funds’ sister publication, I&T News, the fund would first sell-down its $1.26 billion global equities portfolio to meet claims.

While EQC would not comment, it is understood the global equities sell-down had almost been completed. AXA’s annual accounts to the end of December last year, for example, reveal the EQC redeemed its $237.3 million global equities mandate with AllianceBernstein to cover costs incurred by the September earthquake.

The EQC also had global equity mandates with State Street Global Advisors, Tweedy Browne, T. Rowe Price and Capital International.

The remaining 70 per cent of the EQC portfolio was chiefly invested in a range of New Zealand government securities, including about 20 per cent in inflation-linked bonds.

Russell acts as investment adviser to the EQC fund.

EQC collects about $66.6 million in levies each year but New Zealand Prime Minister, John Key, said that figure could triple next year to replenish the disaster fund.

One response to “NZ quake fund skates on very thin reserves”

  1. Investor need to understand the risk of investing in infrastructure fund.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous