Giant Norwegian SWF sizes up active management

An external review is being carried out on behalf of one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, the NOK2.47 trillion ($405 billion) Norwegian Government Pension Fund – Global, to determine whether active management should continue, with opinions sought from international experts in the UK and US.

Norway’s Ministry of Finance has appointed an international group of specialists to evaluate the experience of the SWF’s fund manager, Norges Bank, in active management, and has also asked the bank to prepare a more detailed plan for active management with descriptions of the main strategies for achieving excess returns.

The international group consists of Professors Andrew Ang from Columbia Business School, Stephen Schaefer from London Business School and William N. Goetzmann from the Yale School of Management.

In addition, international consultant Mercer has been commissioned to write a report on the use of active management and active ownership efforts in other large funds internationally.

In its report to Storting, or Parliament, on the management of Global, the Ministry announced that the evolution of the
scheme’s investment strategy would include an external review of the future of active management.

Sponsored Content

“The Ministry will in spring 2010 present the Storting with more information and an assessment of whether or to what extent active management of the Government Pension Fund – Global ought to be continued,” the report said.

The Report No.20 to the Storting notes that the Ministry assumes that financial markets are largely “efficient”, both at any given point in time and over time.

“With financial markets that are generally efficient, it is difficult for active managers to achieve a return in excess of the market return,” the Ministry wrote.

The fund achieved its biggest ever single quarter return of 12.7 per cent, 2.1 per cent above the benchmark, in the second quarter.

In a letter from Norges Bank to the Ministry in March the bank said that now that the fund’s investment universe and benchmark portfolio were gradually being expanded, “there is growing exposure to markets where there is little reason to expect the efficient markets hypothesis to hold. This increases the potential to add value through active management”.

The Ministry said the evolution of Global’s investment strategy ‘may result in asset allocation that is more similar to the composition of other international funds’.

At the moment the Government Pension Fund has an asset allocation split approximately 60 per cent equities and 40 per cent bonds.

“A basic premise in the work to evolve the strategy is the need for adequate limits on other types of risk than market
risk as well, such as operational risk,” the report noted.

“Another requirement will be the need for follow-up of the operational management that helps ensure that the interests of the managers are aligned with the objective of the general investment strategy
for the fund.”

Meanwhile, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) has formed a new executive team as part of the final phase of
an organisational overhaul that started with the appointment of Yngve Slyngstad as chief executive officer in January 2008.

Extensive changes were made in 2008, with the integration of a number of functions which were previously separated
between equity and fixed income management. In addition, risk management was strengthened and fixed income management was restructured.

The new management team of nine includes Slyngstad, Stephen A. Hirsch as deputy chief executive officer, Bengt O. Enge and as chief investment officer.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous