Norway SWF posts booming quarter

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the $456.4 billion (NOK 2,549 billion) Government Pension Fund – Global, returned 13.5 per cent for the quarter due to improved liquidity in fixed income instrument and climbing equity markets, as the fund continued diversification within emerging markets.

The strong performance brought in $29.2 billion for the fund, which was added to $8.8 billion in new inflows, and drove the fund’s year-to-date performance to 21.8 per cent.

With a 17.7 per cent return from its equities portfolio, and 7.2 per cent from its fixed income book, the fund beat its benchmark portfolio by 1.5 per cent for the quarter after adjusting for currency transactions.

But the fixed income portfolio delivered an excess return of 3.3 per cent, compared to the marginal outperformance of the equities investments, which contribute 0.2 per cent.

The outperformance of fixed income instruments was attributed to payoffs from illiquid positions taken by the fund before the financial crisis broke, including securitised debt and corporate bond investments. The excess returns from equities were sourced from internally managed portfolios, with a marginally negative contribution from external equity managers.

Sponsored Content

“In a quarter when equity markets rapidly advanced, the different strategies for our active equity management had dissimilar and non-systematic exposure to underlying market movements,” the fund stated.

Norges Bank Investment Management, the investment arm of the fund, has awarded 14 specialist mandates for external managers so far this year, eight of which target emerging markets. At the end of September, it was invested with locally based managers in China, India, Russia, Poland, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Brazil and South Africa.

Compared to the first nine months of 2008, the performance-based fees paid by the fund to external managers rose from $46.4 million to $221.8 million by the end of September. The vastly larger aggregate fee reflected better performance – which are not awarded on the basis of market movements but on outperformance over time, typically rolling 36-month periods – and the appointment of additional managers.

The fund’s equity portfolio rose 2 per cent to comprise 62 per cent of the fund’s assets during the quarter. At the end of September, the found owned, on average, 1 per cent of the world’s listed companies at the close of the third quarter.

It noted that absolute volatility at the end of September was “not significantly higher” than mid-2007, before the market collapse. It referred to a key financial risk indicator in the money market, the spread between US Treasury Bill yields and interbank lending rates, which “narrowed further in the third quarter to levels seen before the start of the financial turmoil in mid-2007″.

“The liquidity crisis therefore seems to be over,” the fund concluded.

Between January 1, 1998 and September 30, 2009, the fund produced an annual return of 4.5 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous