MSCI invites comment on SRI indexes

MSCI’s proposed global socially responsible indexes are being critiqued by not only MSCI clients but by the wider community as MSCI widens its consultation process for the proposal.

MSCI’s executive director, Michael Anderson (pictured), said the global index provider is consulting with different market participants (clients and non-clients) such as passive and active managers, asset owners and brokers.

“So far MSCI had consultation discussions with all these types of market participants,” he said. “MSCI is happy to speak with any market participant interested in sharing his feedback.”

MSCI is also actively soliciting feedback from its major clients.

The SRI index is part of a bigger proposal to create an “extensive lineup” of indexes that will incorporate ESG for the first time, including country and industry indexes and all will adopt the best-in-class methodology.

Sponsored Content

The global social responsible index aims to support the benchmarking and other index-related needs of investors who seek to invest in accordance with their values, such as religious beliefs, moral standards or ethical views.

Companies that are inconsistent with a specific values-based criteria will be excluded from the proposed index, instead it will specifically target companies with high ESG ratings relative to their sector peers.

“In the current methodology proposal, MSCI would apply a screening based on the company’s individual ESG rating in order to ensure high ESG quality as well as based on a ‘standard’ set of values-based criteria: alcohol, civilian firearms, gambling, military weapons, nuclear power, tobacco, adult entertainment and GMO,” said Anderson. “All the research information (ratings and values-based screens) used in the construction of the MSCI ESG Indices are developed and maintained in house my MSCI ESG Research.”

Anderson said the current proposed MSCI Global Socially Responsible Index would include 422 constituents, based on December 1, 2010, data.

MSCI launched the proposal, which propelled ESG factors into the mainstream, following its merger with RiskMetrics in June last year.

“The consultation was launched based on preliminary client interest in such an index,” said Anderson.

It is not definite at this stage if the consultation will lead to the creation of the MSCI globally socially responsible indices; a final decision will be announced March 4.

One response to “MSCI invites comment on SRI indexes”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous