McKinsey’s tips on sustainability integration

More companies are recognising sustainability as a core business issue, but according to McKinsey and Company they are still failing to capture its full value, in particular struggling with incorporating it into organisational processes such as performance management.

A McKinsey global survey, garnering responses from 3,344 executives from the full range of regions, company size and industries, found that the leaders in sustainability have in place the key components of performance measurement.

In this year’s survey respondents were better at fostering an organisational culture around sustainability but struggle with execution including employee motivation and capability building.

Of the responses 58 per cent of executives say sustainability is fully or mostly integrated into their companies’ culture, but 38 per cent say that is true for performance measurement.

The good news is that this year McKinsey found that 43 per cent of executives say their companies seek to align sustainability with their overall business goals, missions or values, up from 30 per cent in 2012.

One of the reasons for the shift, according to McKinsey, is more involvement from leaders in the business with chief executives now twice as likely to say sustainability is their top priority.

Sponsored Content

But while sustainability is rising in significance there is still some way to integrate it into the core business, with challenges in execution including the absence of performance incentives and the presence of short-term earnings pressure that’s at odds with the long-term nature of the issues, as well as accountability.

According to McKinsey there are common organisational traits among those that stand out as leaders.

These are: setting aggressive external targets or goals for sustainability initiatives; a unified sustainability strategy with clearly articulated strategic priorities, aggressive internal targets or goals for sustainability initiatives, broad leadership coalition in shaping or co-creating the sustainability strategy, goals and milestones, the financial benefits of sustainability are clearly understood across the organisation.

McKinsey founds that the companies with a unified strategy and no more than five strategic priorities were almost three times as likely to be among the strongest performers, both financially and on measures of sustainability.

Lack of goals is a “sustainability killer”, the report said, and yet McKinsey’s analysis of S&P500 companies suggests that only one in five companies sets quantified, long-term sustainability goals, and half did not have any.

In order to shift McKinsey calls for companies to create accountability around sustainability including incentives, according to the United Nations Global Compact only one in 12 companies link executive remuneration to sustainability performance.

It also calls for companies to make a case that sustainability can pay for itself, and that this has to be done clearly with fully costed financial data and delivered in the language of business.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Listed companies are failing on sustainability

US companies are failing to meet a 10-year roadmap to sustainability and some sectors globally are ‘inherently unsustainable’ requiring a drastic refocus, according to two separate reports released this week by leading sustainability research firms Ceres and EIRIS. A report on the progress that some of the world’s biggest companies are making towards achieving sustainability

OECD, ITUC call for more green investment

Amid calls from global leaders for pension funds to invest more in the green economy, institutional green investments still languish at less than 1 per cent of portfolios. A recent OECD report looks at some of the barriers facing investors wanting to invest more in the sector, with regulatory uncertainty and a lack of suitable

Money for water

The global scarcity of water continues to make headlines, but a water-themed investment approach is only just starting to make waves with large institutional investors. Estimates of the assets in equity funds in this niche corner of the investment world vary from about $3 billion to $6 billion in funds under management – a veritable

GMO’s Grantham bets against irrational markets

Supposedly long-term investors typically have the patience to wait about three years to see if an investment strategy will pay-off with managers needing to manage to their own and their client’s career risk tolerance, investment icon and Grantham, Mayo and van Otterloo (GMO) founder Jeremy Grantham says. In his quarterly letter to investors, Grantham says

Mercer: think laterally on bonds

The angst in Europe has calmed down, relatively speaking, but according to Mercer, it will be a long haul, with deleveraging there and in the US taking many years. Investors need to act accordingly. Part of the problem is that conventionally safe assets, such as US Treasuries, are expensive. “That will take years to work

CEM study reveals in-house savings

A defining characteristic of leading pension funds globally is the cost savings garnered from in-house investment management. An organisational design study by CEM Benchmarking has revealed that “leading” funds have an average of 49 per cent of assets managed in-house, and yet the internal staff and non-manager third-party costs make up only 15 per cent

Previous