McKinsey’s tips on sustainability integration

More companies are recognising sustainability as a core business issue, but according to McKinsey and Company they are still failing to capture its full value, in particular struggling with incorporating it into organisational processes such as performance management.

A McKinsey global survey, garnering responses from 3,344 executives from the full range of regions, company size and industries, found that the leaders in sustainability have in place the key components of performance measurement.

In this year’s survey respondents were better at fostering an organisational culture around sustainability but struggle with execution including employee motivation and capability building.

Of the responses 58 per cent of executives say sustainability is fully or mostly integrated into their companies’ culture, but 38 per cent say that is true for performance measurement.

The good news is that this year McKinsey found that 43 per cent of executives say their companies seek to align sustainability with their overall business goals, missions or values, up from 30 per cent in 2012.

One of the reasons for the shift, according to McKinsey, is more involvement from leaders in the business with chief executives now twice as likely to say sustainability is their top priority.

Sponsored Content

But while sustainability is rising in significance there is still some way to integrate it into the core business, with challenges in execution including the absence of performance incentives and the presence of short-term earnings pressure that’s at odds with the long-term nature of the issues, as well as accountability.

According to McKinsey there are common organisational traits among those that stand out as leaders.

These are: setting aggressive external targets or goals for sustainability initiatives; a unified sustainability strategy with clearly articulated strategic priorities, aggressive internal targets or goals for sustainability initiatives, broad leadership coalition in shaping or co-creating the sustainability strategy, goals and milestones, the financial benefits of sustainability are clearly understood across the organisation.

McKinsey founds that the companies with a unified strategy and no more than five strategic priorities were almost three times as likely to be among the strongest performers, both financially and on measures of sustainability.

Lack of goals is a “sustainability killer”, the report said, and yet McKinsey’s analysis of S&P500 companies suggests that only one in five companies sets quantified, long-term sustainability goals, and half did not have any.

In order to shift McKinsey calls for companies to create accountability around sustainability including incentives, according to the United Nations Global Compact only one in 12 companies link executive remuneration to sustainability performance.

It also calls for companies to make a case that sustainability can pay for itself, and that this has to be done clearly with fully costed financial data and delivered in the language of business.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Kay calls for philosophical shift

In an interview with conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, John Kay, economist and author of the UK government-commissioned enquiry into long termism and the UK equity markets, has said it is “fanciful to imagine large number of trustees will have the skills and knowledge to have long-term relationships with corporates”. Kay says the key players in the UK equity

UK equity allocation falls

Equity allocation by UK pension schemes continues to fall, but the assets are being re-allocated into “everything else except gilts”, according to Mercer chief investment officer, Andrew Kirton. Last year equities allocations by UK pension funds fell by 5 per cent, according to Mercer, as they attempt to deal with the enormous amount of pension

CalSTRS considers
asset risk factors

The $152.5-billion Californian State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) is undertaking an asset-allocation review that will consider the underlying risk factors of assets for the first time. Chris Ailman, chief investment officer of CalSTRS, says the fund is in the middle of an asset-allocation study, which would likely take six months, and would take a different

Natixis champions
Asian alternatives

In a bid to achieve long-term returns without incurring the risk of today’s choppy markets, Asia’s biggest institutional investors are increasingly opting for alternatives in their asset allocation. The majority of respondents in a survey of 120 Asian institutional investors no longer deem long-held industry norms – such as lengthy holding periods or conventional 60/40

PIP in to infrastructure

A swathe of UK pension funds is poised to increase its exposure to infrastructure. In a small start, which enthusiasts believe will quickly grow, the Pension Infrastructure Platform (PIP) will launch as a fund in January 2013, targeting £2 billion ($3.24 billion) worth of projects with the backing of around 10 UK pension funds. The

Complexity: thinking ahead

Complexity is, well complex. And as trite as that sounds, it’s something investors, even professional investors, don’t understand well enough, according to Tim Hodgson, head of the Thinking Ahead Group at Towers Watson. The Thinking Ahead Group (TAG), as has been reported here before, gets paid to think – a gig conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com is envious of.

Previous