Malaysian investments favour domestic, cross-border strategies

To combat
the financial crisis, Khazanah Nasional Berhard, the US$25.7 billion
investment arm of the Malaysian government, will focus on catalysing domestic
economic growth and continuing its program of strategic cross-border
investments.

Khazanah,
which is entrusted with managing the Malaysian government’s commercial assets
and undertaking strategic domestic and global investments, aims to stimulate
the Malaysian economy by focusing on domestic investments with “high economic
and job creation multipliers,” the public company said in a statement.

The
manager has stakes in more than 50 companies, including an array of ‘government-linked
companies’, which are involved in industries ranging from banking, power,
telecommunications, infrastructure, transport and venture capital.

In the
four years to 2008, Khazanah and its underlying companies injected
approximately RM36 billion (US$9.89 billion) into the Malaysian economy. For
the three years to 2011, it has allocated $15.94 billion to be invested domestically
in industries including telecommunications, infrastructure, health care and
tourism. It will also target sectors that it regards as “new engines of
growth”.

But this
domestic focus will not stall its cross-border investment activities and
ambitions to attract foreign direct investment into

Sponsored Content

Malaysia.

“Khazanah
will continue to strengthen regional investment linkages and selectively look
for two-way investment opportunities to bring in more foreign direct investment
as well as continuing to selectively regionalise,” the company said.

In the
course of 2008, the financial crisis diminished the returns from Khazanah’s
listed investments portfolio, resulting in a decline of 35.7 per cent for the
year.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous