Large hedge funds to dominate as banks, small funds withdraw

Large, diversified hedge funds with institutional-quality operations are more likely to survive their smaller rivals as the sector continues to contract, according to a research note by Morgan Stanley.

Larger, institutional-quality managers are expected to gain market share as smaller funds continue to shut-down – a process that appears to be accelerating, Morgan Stanley writes in a January 2009 Investment Focus note.

The larger managers are more likely to commit resources to compliance and operational infrastructure than their smaller rivals as regulation of financial markets continues to evolve.

New, increasingly demanding regulation will also limit the ability of smaller managers to exploit investment opportunities.

While larger managers can also build customised trading programs to adjust to changing regulation, smaller firms must often wait for off-the-shelf trading programs to be modified by vendors.

Sponsored Content

“Institutional-quality managers, who typically possess more sophisticated risk infrastructures, have the ability to pursue non-standard means to hedge exposures and, thus, can capitalise on the greater inefficiencies created by new regulatory restrictions,” Morgan Stanley states.

The surviving hedge funds will find themselves with fewer competitors as banks, under pressure to reduce leverage and, by extension, proprietary risk-taking operations, withdraw from markets in which they once competed with hedge funds.

“While the outlook on near-term returns for hedge funds remains unclear, we believe that opportunities are abundant for investors with a longer-term time horizon to take advantage of significant distortions in the market.”

Such opportunities exist in the convertible arbitrage, bank loan and investment-grade corporate bond markets, Morgan Stanley writes.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous