LACERS prioritises local companies

The Los Angeles City Employees’ Retirement System (LACERS) will give preference to Los Angeles-based companies in its alternative investment allocations, providing all else is considered equal in terms of performance, strategy, personnel, and philosophy.


Chair of the investment committee, Moctesuma Esparza, has requested that the traditional alternative investment policy include a provision relative to the geographic diversification of investments that would give preference to LA-based companies if all other considerations were equal.

Esparza also requested that the policy include a provision that would require diversity and workforce composition information from the general partners as part of the due diligence process.

The fund revised its alternative investment policy at the last investment committee meeting with a framework set for a more consistent and disciplined approach to the traditional core private equity portfolio, including additional due diligence and risk management oversight practices.

The fund is also considering expanding its asset allocation ranges by 25 per cent on the back of recent market fluctuations. At the end of April the US equity and non-US equity allocations were below their targets, and at 10 per cent the alternative allocations were above the 8 per cent target.

The board proposes the ranges be extended by 25 per cent at the upper and lower limits until a new asset allocation review can be completed.

Sponsored Content

At the end of April the target allocations were: 22 per cent to bonds, 1 per cent to cash, 42 per cent to US equities, 20 per cent to non-US equities, 7.4 per cent to real estate and 10 per cent to alternatives.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Sovereigns versus citizens

As sovereign wealth funds continue to grow, some are running into tussles with citizens over particular investments or the purpose of the fund. Transparency and greater engagement can help.

Return targets head downward

The challenging market environment is putting pressure on pension funds. In response, many are lowering return targets, rather than taking on more risk or requesting larger contributions.

Never underestimate quality

USS's COO Howard Brindle is one of the most experienced investment operations executives in the pension industry, he talks about business transformation and the importance of talent.

Board make-up matters

The more political appointees and worker representatives sit on US pension fund boards, the more those funds will respond to incentives that encourage riskier investing, research has found.

McKinsey: Long game is best play

Calls for a long-term investment focus have lacked a sophisticated metric to back them up – until now. The McKinsey Global Institute has found tangible benefits from shunning short-termism.

On the geopolitical horizon

It’s impossible for asset owners to predict the year’s geopolitical upsets. Diversification will be the key to a resilient portfolio.

Previous