Kazakhstan SWF invites global equity managers aboard

The $23 billion National Oil Fund of Kazakhstan, an economic stabilisation fund built from surplus oil revenues, is seeking external active and passive global equity managers as it pumps money into the domestic economy in an attempt to offset the impacts of the financial crisis.

The fund, founded in 2000, has requested proposals from large institutional firms to manage active and passive mandates of about $200 million. The tender document states that the fund aims to appoint managers which can deliver sustainable returns with low risk and provide adequate liquidity.

It is the first equity manager search that the sovereign wealth fund has undertaken, top1000funds.com understands. According to its June 5 financial statements, the fund held $19.8 billion in international reserves and $2.3 billion in gold.

The fund requires applying managers to hold an amount of funds under management equal to at least $50 billion, and have 10 years of experience in managing mandates.

The managers must also have at least $1 billion of client money invested the same way prescribed by the mandates on offer. It also asks for details of the capital market inefficiencies that managers will attempt to exploit.

The oil fund is managed within the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Its assets have sunk more than 15 per cent from $ 27.5 billion in December 2008.

Sponsored Content

Kazakhstan authorities are drawing on the fund as the domestic economy becomes increasingly stressed by the global financial crisis.

In 2008 the Kazakhstan government announced that it would pump $10 billion from the National Oil Fund into the country’s banking, building and agricultural industries, and into the small-to-medium business sector.

In March, a further $4 billion was committed to the stimulus plan and injected into the banking system.

The fund grew steadily since its inception, a beneficiary of higher oil prices. But the financial crisis and steep drop-off in commodity prices have stymied its expansion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous