Japan’s trifecta of challenges

Iconic view of Daigoji Temple in autumn. Kyoto, Japan. A World Heritage Site since 1994

After 18 years working with Japan’s leading pension funds and asset managers Chris Battaglia, president of the Global Fiduciary Symposium in Japan, is well placed to observe the pressures on the country’s retirement system and observes its evolution.

Japan has the trifecta of demographic challenges which are putting tremendous and growing pressure on its economy and social programs. A rapidly aging society, a declining birthrate, and an absence of any reliable immigration policy that might mitigate its rapidly declining population.

These challenges are well documented, and have been growing in size and scope, but now at a faster rate than expected. Japan has the highest life expectancy in the world for those who reach age 60 which increases the size and duration of the long-term liabilities of pillar one, and pillar two pension systems. “When I’m 64”, the famous Beatles song that laments the aging process, was written more than 50 years ago. In Japan, this song title might be better amended to “When I’m 84!”

According to Amlan Roy, global expert on demographics, these challenges are amplified by unsustainable promises made on the legacy benefits of Japan’s DB plans. These unsustainable benefit promises are not just a point of pain for Japan and other aging populations, but they are also the burden of much younger economies struggling to find the balance of government sponsored pensions alongside the adaptation of corporate DC plans, as well as personal savings and investment for retirement like Japan’s NISA and IDeCo programs.

To be sure, Japan is making progress with the advancement of its version of the 401(k) and the improvement of their asset management business. Many large Japanese corporations, such as Panasonic, are showing signs of success with the addition of their defined contributions plans and Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is seeking to improve Japan’s asset management business by providing incentives for foreign asset management companies to expand their business in Japan. The intended result is increased competition with the hopes to turning Japan’s famously known “saver” population into investors.

Japan, like many Asian cultures, is known for having a long-term view of the world and when it comes to pension investing, their strategy is no different. For example, many investors in the western world would find it interesting to see how a pension system like the GPIF can be sustained with nominal return targets much less than its peers at public pension systems outside of Japan.

Sponsored Content

While many public pension systems around the world continue to reach for returns of 7 per cent, or higher, Japan’s GPIF has built a sustainable plan for its system and beneficiaries with target returns at far less than half that amount. With continued emphasis on fees and an unswerving long-term approach, the GPIF reminds us that pensions are more of a diligent and disciplined exercise in liability management, rather than maximizing returns on assets.

Amlan Roy reminds us that the etymology of the word demographics is made up of two components, the Greek word, demos, and graphy, which is writing about people. These people characteristics generally fall into two categories when you think about economies and social programs like pension and retirement programs: consumers and workers (somewhere between the ages of 20-70). As Japan transitions to a defined contribution system and continues to sustain its GPIF (the largest retirement fund in the world), we have much to learn form how Japan manages and balances the unique characteristics of its aging and declining population and these two critically important cohorts that drive all economic outcomes for countries, governments, and societies.

This microsite includes stories from the Global Fiduciary Symposium held in Tokyo in November. The program is focused on highlighting major investment solutions, as well as providing updates on pension reforms in Japan and around the world. Top1000funds.com was the symposium media partner.Chris J. Battaglia

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Dutch reform to tread lightly on investment mix

When the Netherlands pension reforms were announced in 2011, many experts argued they were likely to substantially increase the risk appetites at the funds guarding the country’s $1-trillion pension assets. Recent developments to the reform proposals make the overall impact far from clear, however, suggesting there will be no bonanza for Dutch investment managers. The

Previous