It’s all good: the lessons of the past three years

The positions have changed, over the past three years, in the food chain of professional funds management, away from the manager and towards the fiduciary. And it is not just the large fiduciary funds which can benefit from the trend.

The financial crisis has taught everyone a lesson, although it has to be said that some of those lessons are a little illusory. Real lessons include: counterparty risk is important, correlations are closer than you think and all stakeholders need to understand what they are investing in.

Less real lessons include: fund managers don’t know what they’re doing, they gouge fees and are disingenuous about the possible results of their activities. In the extreme, it has been said, fund managers are no better than the investment bankers they have always criticised for their transactional attitude to investment.

The rising power of the fiduciary has been coming for some time and would have arrived with or without any crisis. The recognition that unlisted assets, such as infrastructure projects, can provide genuinely low correlations with listed markets, can provide more reliable income streams and don’t have to attract high fees has helped the trend.

The very big funds have started to co-invest in these projects and smaller funds are scrutinising co-mingled infrastructure, unlisted real estate and other big-ticket investment vehicles to better diversify their portfolios.

For smaller funds, though, the crisis has been a real boon. With capital in short supply, they have learned that they can better negotiate with all service providers, particularly those managing alternatives. At the edges, they can also afford to recruit more specialists of their own and spend more time exploring new opportunities in a volatile world.

Sponsored Content

They have also been reminded of the fact that beta delivers most of their returns. When it comes to asset allocation, it’s really up to the fiduciaries’ management and board to make the calls, perhaps in association with a consultant. Sure, managers can help, even take over some of the work through various overlays, but asset allocation responsibility is now, more than ever, back with the board and management of the funds.

Three years ago, the investment world was staring at an abyss. To a certain extent, there are still dark places where the investment world has not returned to “normal”. Indeed, we now speak of the “new normal” – a phrase coined by the big bond manager PIMCO, which refers to continued volatility, uncertainty, low growth in some areas and lots of opportunities in other areas.

Nearly three years ago, in September 2008, we launched this news and information service for fiduciaries. The staff of Top1000Funds has been privileged to report on the changes which have occurred in that time and, hopefully, provide some helpful information for fiduciary funds to negotiate the new world.

This is my last column for this news service. Amanda White, the editor, will become publisher and a new senior journalist will soon be appointed.

For my part, I intend to return to China, write a couple of books and, as they say, smell the roses. My personal email is: greg.bright@binalong.net

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous